sg16

Tuesday, 30 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Tom Honermann

Sunday, 28 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Corentin Jabot
• [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) Tom Honermann

Wednesday, 24 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Martinho Fernandes

Tuesday, 23 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Jayesh Badwaik
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Marcos Bento
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Marcos Bento
• [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for June 17th, 2020 Tom Honermann
• [SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference Tom Honermann via BlueJeans Network

Monday, 22 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Martinho Fernandes
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review Zach Laine
• Re: [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review Zach Laine
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Peter Brett

Sunday, 21 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review Vinnie Falco
• Re: [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review Ville Voutilainen
• Re: [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review Vinnie Falco
• [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review JeanHeyd Meneide
• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Tom Honermann

Saturday, 20 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Corentin Jabot
• [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases Jens Maurer

Friday, 19 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Jens Maurer

Thursday, 18 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Ville Voutilainen
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Ville Voutilainen
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Corentin Jabot
• [SG16] Emojis in identifiers Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Martinho Fernandes
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Matthew Woehlke
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] Virtual evolution meeting on Unicode identifiers, Thursday June 18th @ 10AM Pacific Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] Virtual evolution meeting on Unicode identifiers, Thursday June 18th @ 10AM Pacific Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 JF Bastien
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Matthew Woehlke
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 JF Bastien
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Matthew Woehlke
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Matthew Woehlke
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] Virtual evolution meeting on Unicode identifiers, Thursday June 18th @ 10AM Pacific Alisdair Meredith

Wednesday, 17 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] C9X RATIONALE WG14/N850 Hubert Tong
• [SG16] C9X RATIONALE WG14/N850 Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] Seeking guidance on use, overloading, or overriding of terms used in normative references Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Goals for rewording [lex] et. al.. Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] Seeking guidance on use, overloading, or overriding of terms used in normative references JeanHeyd Meneide
• Re: [SG16] Goals for rewording [lex] et. al.. Steve Downey
• [SG16] Seeking guidance on use, overloading, or overriding of terms used in normative references Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Goals for rewording [lex] et. al.. Corentin Jabot
• [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-17) Tom Honermann

Tuesday, 16 June 2020

• [SG16] Goals for rewording [lex] et. al.. Steve Downey

Monday, 15 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Jens Maurer
• [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Terminology Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Hubert Tong

Sunday, 14 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] [wg14/wg21 liaison] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Terminology Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] [wg14/wg21 liaison] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals Corentin
• Re: [SG16] [wg14/wg21 liaison] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals Bjarne Stroustrup
• Re: [SG16] [wg14/wg21 liaison] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals Florian Weimer
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Terminology Henri Sivonen
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Jens Maurer

Saturday, 13 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for June 10th, 2020 Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for June 10th, 2020 Hubert Tong
• [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for June 10th, 2020 Tom Honermann
• [SG16] Updated: WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference Tom Honermann via BlueJeans Network
• [SG16] Updated: WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference Tom Honermann via BlueJeans Network
• Re: [SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference Corentin Jabot
• [SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference Tom Honermann via BlueJeans Network

Friday, 12 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals Corentin Jabot

Thursday, 11 June 2020

• [SG16] Fwd: [review] [text] Text formal review Glen Fernandes
• Re: [SG16] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals Thiago Macieira
• Re: [SG16] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Terminology Corentin Jabot
• [SG16] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Terminology Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Terminology Corentin Jabot

Wednesday, 10 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Jens Maurer
• [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Terminology Peter Brett
• Re: [SG16] Terminology Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Terminology Peter Brett
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Hubert Tong
• [SG16] Terminology Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Steve Downey

Tuesday, 9 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Corentin Jabot
• [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) Tom Honermann

Friday, 5 June 2020

• [SG16] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Steve Downey

Thursday, 4 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 JF Bastien
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Corentin Jabot

Wednesday, 3 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Hubert Tong

Tuesday, 2 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Nathan Sidwell
• Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Corentin Jabot
• [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? Alisdair Meredith

Monday, 1 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Fwd: Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Fwd: Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Fwd: Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Fwd: Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? Peter Brett
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Peter Brett
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Hubert Tong
• [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Corentin
• [SG16] Fwd: Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Peter Brett
• Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Jens Maurer

Last message date: 2020-06-30 22:27:14