Subject: Re: Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters
From: Hubert Tong (hubert.reinterpretcast_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-10 17:06:34
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 5:39 PM Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 10/06/2020 23.23, Hubert Tong via SG16 wrote:
> > I agree with Corentin's point that the strict use of abstract characters
> introduces problems where a coded character set contains multiple values
> for a single abstract character/contains characters that are canonically
> the same but assigned different values.
> I have a hard time imagining such a thing. Can you give an example?
Yes, U+FA9A as described in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_unification
has this situation with U+6F22.
These characters are distinct as members of a coded character set, but as
abstract characters, I do not believe we can easily say the same.
SG16 list run by email@example.com