ISOCPP sg16 List: by author

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Alisdair Meredith

Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 19:14:55)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] Virtual evolution meeting on Unicode identifiers, Thursday June 18th @ 10AM Pacific (2020-06-18 13:35:19)
[SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-02 11:34:27)
Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? (2020-06-01 15:10:51)

Bjarne Stroustrup

Re: [SG16] [wg14/wg21 liaison] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals (2020-06-14 13:13:41)

Corentin

Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-21 12:03:13)
Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-15 17:40:49)
Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-15 16:50:07)
Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-15 16:30:03)
Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-15 15:38:36)
[SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-15 11:14:28)
Re: [SG16] [wg14/wg21 liaison] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals (2020-06-14 13:47:29)
[SG16] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals (2020-06-11 15:40:36)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 20:33:47)
Re: [SG16] Fwd: Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed (2020-06-01 20:19:57)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 17:30:26)
Re: [SG16] Fwd: Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed (2020-06-01 17:28:08)
Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? (2020-06-01 17:20:39)
Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? (2020-06-01 15:16:02)
Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? (2020-06-01 15:07:10)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 14:47:17)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 14:13:43)
[SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? (2020-06-01 12:53:48)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 09:22:05)
[SG16] Fwd: Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed (2020-06-01 09:13:28)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 09:08:41)

Corentin Jabot

Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-30 16:39:48)
Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-30 14:49:29)
Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-30 05:31:34)
Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-30 04:26:12)
Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-30 04:15:03)
Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-28 06:03:31)
Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-28 05:37:06)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-23 15:46:08)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-23 14:27:32)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-22 12:45:38)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-21 11:55:55)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 20:42:00)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 16:50:54)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 16:32:06)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 15:45:11)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 15:28:12)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 13:47:55)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 13:16:37)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 11:54:24)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 08:05:12)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 22:42:27)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 22:26:06)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 21:30:16)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 19:08:50)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 15:23:55)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 14:05:44)
Re: [SG16] Goals for rewording [lex] et. al.. (2020-06-17 16:10:07)
Re: [SG16] Goals for rewording [lex] et. al.. (2020-06-17 14:34:54)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 17:01:49)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 16:20:10)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 16:17:13)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 16:11:07)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 15:47:59)
Re: [SG16] Terminology (2020-06-15 09:02:59)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 08:48:09)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 08:41:31)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 08:18:39)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 22:53:27)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 22:28:43)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 22:27:06)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 22:26:06)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 21:21:48)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 20:57:01)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 20:19:06)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 19:33:24)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 18:57:14)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 18:48:07)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 17:39:04)
Re: [SG16] Terminology (2020-06-14 15:55:36)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 09:03:16)
Re: [SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference (2020-06-13 08:52:58)
Re: [SG16] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals (2020-06-12 09:00:34)
Re: [SG16] Terminology (2020-06-11 15:49:03)
Re: [SG16] Terminology (2020-06-11 13:22:08)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-10 22:44:59)
Re: [SG16] Terminology (2020-06-10 19:45:34)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 19:08:11)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 17:46:20)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 02:03:18)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 01:03:26)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 00:56:04)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 21:21:29)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 20:59:31)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 17:14:22)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 17:01:32)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 16:02:47)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-05 00:58:49)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-04 23:50:16)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-04 22:33:27)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-04 08:04:22)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-03 17:29:32)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-03 07:19:31)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-03 06:52:35)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-03 06:45:50)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-02 11:57:05)

Florian Weimer

Re: [SG16] [wg14/wg21 liaison] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals (2020-06-14 10:59:49)

Glen Fernandes

[SG16] Fwd: [review] [text] Text formal review (2020-06-11 18:42:04)

Henri Sivonen

Re: [SG16] Terminology (2020-06-14 09:00:03)

Hubert Tong

Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-20 22:54:19)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 21:14:14)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 19:26:45)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 19:05:40)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 16:30:40)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 16:10:54)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 14:03:49)
Re: [SG16] C9X RATIONALE WG14/N850 (2020-06-17 22:40:56)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 16:07:21)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 13:44:33)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 00:33:20)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 22:21:46)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 22:06:15)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 21:12:22)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 18:03:28)
Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for June 10th, 2020 (2020-06-13 18:13:41)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-10 22:06:34)
[SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-10 21:23:45)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 19:28:13)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 19:23:22)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 19:01:50)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 17:28:30)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 03:38:36)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 01:37:55)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 23:39:38)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 22:31:56)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 21:05:49)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 20:17:30)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-04 23:29:22)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-04 23:19:29)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-03 23:25:26)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-03 01:38:28)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 15:47:40)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 14:04:41)

Jayesh Badwaik

Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-23 17:02:29)

JeanHeyd Meneide

[SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review (2020-06-21 14:16:07)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] Seeking guidance on use, overloading, or overriding of terms used in normative references (2020-06-17 16:04:49)

Jens Maurer

Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-30 22:27:14)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-22 15:11:16)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-21 11:45:24)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 19:50:52)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 17:15:28)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 15:42:35)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 14:51:58)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 13:16:27)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 10:14:33)
[SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 07:31:42)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-19 05:26:05)
[SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 18:55:38)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] Seeking guidance on use, overloading, or overriding of terms used in normative references (2020-06-17 18:20:26)
Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-15 11:43:26)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 07:59:17)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 07:00:02)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 20:45:27)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 19:55:44)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 18:44:52)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 06:59:25)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-10 21:39:33)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-05 06:16:03)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-04 22:51:29)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-04 22:27:17)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-03 17:23:21)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 19:47:46)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 06:10:14)

JF Bastien

Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 15:25:42)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 14:46:42)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-04 23:43:23)

Marcos Bento

Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-23 15:24:12)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-23 11:56:24)

Martinho Fernandes

Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-24 08:35:48)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-22 15:02:45)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 16:52:58)

Matthew Woehlke

Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 16:25:46)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 15:08:14)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 14:33:30)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 13:51:48)

Nathan Sidwell

Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? (2020-06-02 16:28:00)

Peter Brett

Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-22 06:56:14)
Re: [SG16] Terminology (2020-06-10 19:59:03)
Re: [SG16] Terminology (2020-06-10 19:35:27)
Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? (2020-06-01 15:04:07)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 14:38:49)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 07:48:33)

Steve Downey

Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-19 15:07:34)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 21:57:34)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 21:18:38)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 16:35:38)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] Virtual evolution meeting on Unicode identifiers, Thursday June 18th @ 10AM Pacific (2020-06-18 15:35:18)
[SG16] C9X RATIONALE WG14/N850 (2020-06-17 20:40:55)
Re: [SG16] Goals for rewording [lex] et. al.. (2020-06-17 16:00:16)
[SG16] Goals for rewording [lex] et. al.. (2020-06-16 23:19:33)
Re: [SG16] Terminology (2020-06-11 14:18:06)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 00:03:31)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 23:12:02)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 17:08:29)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 16:45:09)
[SG16] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-05 20:35:31)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-05 01:04:32)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-05 00:46:21)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-05 00:22:46)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-04 23:36:04)
Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-04 22:54:43)
[SG16] D1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-04 22:14:42)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-04 15:15:16)

Thiago Macieira

Re: [SG16] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals (2020-06-11 15:59:49)

Tom Honermann

Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-30 16:19:39)
Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-30 14:32:42)
Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-30 04:49:13)
Re: [SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-30 03:52:04)
[SG16] New draft revision: D2029R2 (Proposed resolution for core issues 411, 1656, and 2333; numeric and universal character escapes in character and string literals) (2020-06-28 04:50:35)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-23 16:03:36)
[SG16] SG16 meeting summary for June 17th, 2020 (2020-06-23 04:21:46)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-22 16:23:58)
Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-21 04:23:30)
Re: [SG16] Handling of non-basic characters in early translation phases (2020-06-20 20:45:24)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 20:35:57)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] Virtual evolution meeting on Unicode identifiers, Thursday June 18th @ 10AM Pacific (2020-06-18 15:35:20)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 15:21:40)
Re: [SG16] [isocpp-ext] P1949R4 - C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 (2020-06-18 14:44:48)
[SG16] Seeking guidance on use, overloading, or overriding of terms used in normative references (2020-06-17 15:06:25)
[SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-17) (2020-06-17 01:59:43)
Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-15 17:21:49)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 16:54:36)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 16:52:42)
Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-15 16:41:12)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 16:17:46)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 16:17:00)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 16:06:53)
Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-15 15:56:08)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 15:49:14)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 15:30:46)
Re: [SG16] What do we want from source to internal conversion? (2020-06-15 15:17:42)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-15 06:40:44)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 22:36:08)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 22:02:58)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 21:54:14)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 21:46:14)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 19:16:51)
Re: [SG16] Agreeing with Corentin's point re: problem with strict use of abstract characters (2020-06-14 17:21:17)
Re: [SG16] [wg14/wg21 liaison] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals (2020-06-14 17:02:05)
Re: [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for June 10th, 2020 (2020-06-13 19:55:36)
[SG16] SG16 meeting summary for June 10th, 2020 (2020-06-13 17:01:23)
Re: [SG16] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals (2020-06-12 19:39:41)
Re: [SG16] Characters literals in preprocessor conditionals (2020-06-11 15:53:56)
[SG16] Terminology (2020-06-10 19:27:47)
Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-10 18:51:11)
[SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-06-10) (2020-06-09 14:48:09)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-03 18:59:51)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-03 03:19:20)
Re: [SG16] Is it an error to encounter a character without a valid UCN? (2020-06-03 02:55:53)
Re: [SG16] Fwd: Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed (2020-06-01 19:48:44)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 17:26:58)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 17:23:08)
Re: [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding (2020-06-01 17:19:53)
Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? (2020-06-01 17:14:06)
Re: [SG16] During lexing, What constitute new lines and whitespaces ? (2020-06-01 17:01:43)
Re: [SG16] Fwd: Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed (2020-06-01 16:55:57)

Tom Honermann via BlueJeans Network

[SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference (2020-06-23 04:15:52)
[SG16] Updated: WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference (2020-06-13 15:31:50)
[SG16] Updated: WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference (2020-06-13 15:24:20)
[SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference (2020-06-13 03:26:48)

Ville Voutilainen

Re: [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review (2020-06-21 15:54:24)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 22:38:44)
Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers (2020-06-18 22:13:35)

Vinnie Falco

Re: [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review (2020-06-21 18:01:46)
Re: [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review (2020-06-21 15:32:36)

Zach Laine

Re: [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review (2020-06-22 07:10:50)
Re: [SG16] [boost] [review] [text] Text formal review (2020-06-22 07:00:03)

Last message date: 2020-06-30 22:27:14