I recommend adding Unicode Standard - section 3.4 to that list
Notably 10646:2017 doesn't define Abstract Character

On Sat, 13 Jun 2020 at 05:27, Tom Honermann via BlueJeans Network via SG16 <
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> [image: Blue Jeans] <https://bluejeans.com>
> Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> has invited you to a meeting.
> Join Meeting <https://bluejeans.com/140274541?src=htmlEmail>
> (Join from computer or phone)
> ------------------------------
> *Phone Dial-in*
> +1.408.419.1715 (United States(San Jose))
> +1.408.915.6290 (United States(San Jose))
> (Global Numbers <https://www.bluejeans.com/numbers>)
>
> Meeting ID: 140 274 541
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Description:
> Meeting date: June 17th, 2020
> Meeting time: 19:30-21:00 UTC (3:30pm-5:00pm EDT)
> Draft agenda:
> - Continue discussion of terminology updates to strive for in C++23
>
> - Resume discussion of relationships between (abstract) character, (character)
> repertoire, (coded) character set, and character encoding.
> - Review ISO/IEC 10646:2017 section 3 terms and definitions
> (
> https://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c069119_ISO_IEC_10646_2017.zip
> )
> - Review the Unicode glossary (https://www.unicode.org/glossary)
> - Review Corentin's email (
> https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2020/06/1493.php)
> - Compare and contrast terms as described by the above resources.
>
> - Determine suitability of ISO/IEC 10646 terms for use in the C++ standard.
>
> - Discuss the relationship of the above terms to named entities in the standard.
> - Identify possible terms to add to [intro.defs].
> ------------------------------
> Want to test your video connection?
> https://bluejeans.com/111 <https://bluejeans.com/111?ll=en> --
> SG16 mailing list
> SG16_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>