Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 00:27:14 +0200
On 30/06/2020 06.15, Corentin Jabot via SG16 wrote:
> No, especially wide multi characters that are simply not a thing, let's not make them one.
I don't follow. In the status quo working draft, we have in [lex.ccon] p5
after the note:
"The value of a wide-character literal containing multiple c-char s is implementation-defined."
Jens
> No, especially wide multi characters that are simply not a thing, let's not make them one.
I don't follow. In the status quo working draft, we have in [lex.ccon] p5
after the note:
"The value of a wide-character literal containing multiple c-char s is implementation-defined."
Jens
Received on 2020-06-30 17:30:32