C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16] Emojis in identifiers

From: Peter Brett <pbrett_at_[hidden]>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:56:14 +0000
> Whether adding the latter would turn some "yes" votes into
> "no" votes in EWG is unknown. Let's ask.

For clarity, any innovation by WG21 that deviates from the UAX31 guideline will turn my vote from a 'yes' to a 'no' for P1949.

This is not an area in which WG21 should be innovating. People who think that UAX31 is too restrictive and/or not restrictive enough should be getting involved in Unicode in order to enhance UAX31.


Received on 2020-06-22 01:59:28