Alisdair Meredith
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash
Corentin
- [SG16] Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed
- [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- [SG16] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
Corentin Jabot
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
Hubert Tong
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
Jean-Marc Bourguet
Jens Maurer
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
JF Bastien
- Re: [SG16] Guidelines for when a WG21 proposal should be reviewed by SG16, the text and Unicode study group
- Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix
- Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix
- Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix
jm
Keane, Erich
Peter Brett
- Re: [SG16] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
Richard Smith
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
Steve Downey
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-05-27)
- Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-05-27)
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
Thiago Macieira
Tom Honermann
- Re: [SG16] Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed
- [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for May 27th, 2020
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1?
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-05-27)
- Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers
- [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-05-27)
- [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for May 13th, 2020
- [SG16] Guidelines for when a WG21 proposal should be reviewed by SG16, the text and Unicode study group
- [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-05-13)
- Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix
- Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31
- Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix
- Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix
- [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for April 22nd, 2020
Tom Honermann via BlueJeans Network
- [SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference
- [SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference
- [SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference