On 28/05/2020 05.26, Steve Downey wrote:
> They reference each other, and neither is quite complete on its own. The Unicode org guidance on reference seems to be to note that all of there publications are actually an integrated whole.

The odd thing is that each individual UAX annex provides a separate
link to its predecessor version, which runs a bit counter to the
"integrated whole" idea.

> I think how we deal with this is actually a matter for Core? That is, how we want the C++ standard to make reference to other parts of another standard seems to be where CWG should opine authoritatively, rather than Sg16?

Both the additional italics and the Hubert's minimal wording change
to refer to the .txt file in normative text are small and, in my view,
editorial. Let's make this paper as good as it can be.

If CWG has further concerns, they will raise them at the appropriate time.

Jens


> I will note the matter for R5, and provide the options.
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020, 22:54 Zach Laine <whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden] <mailto:whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> It seems that "identifiers" should be italicized in:
>
> [ Note: Upper- and lower-case letters are considered different for all
> identifiers. – end note ]
>
> as it is italicized in a note directly following.
>
> Also, what Hubert said -- the nature of the relationship between the
> references to UAX 44 and the .txt file should be explicitly stated.
>
> Zach
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:00 PM Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden] <mailto:sdowney_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> >
> > Find attached D1949 with edits as instructed in telecon
>