C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review

From: Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 23:26:17 -0400
They reference each other, and neither is quite complete on its own. The
Unicode org guidance on reference seems to be to note that all of there
publications are actually an integrated whole.

I think how we deal with this is actually a matter for Core? That is, how
we want the C++ standard to make reference to other parts of another
standard seems to be where CWG should opine authoritatively, rather than

I will note the matter for R5, and provide the options.

On Wed, May 27, 2020, 22:54 Zach Laine <whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> It seems that "identifiers" should be italicized in:
> [ Note: Upper- and lower-case letters are considered different for all
> identifiers. – end note ]
> as it is italicized in a note directly following.
> Also, what Hubert said -- the nature of the relationship between the
> references to UAX 44 and the .txt file should be explicitly stated.
> Zach
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 5:00 PM Steve Downey <sdowney_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Find attached D1949 with edits as instructed in telecon

Received on 2020-05-27 22:29:32