sg16

Monday, 1 June 2020

• Re: [SG16] Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed Tom Honermann

Sunday, 31 May 2020

• [SG16] Making wide-character literals containing multiple c-char ill-formed Corentin
• [SG16] Conversion of grapheme clusters to (wide) execution encoding Corentin
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Corentin Jabot
• [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for May 27th, 2020 Tom Honermann
• [SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference Tom Honermann via BlueJeans Network

Saturday, 30 May 2020

• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Tom Honermann

Friday, 29 May 2020

• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Steve Downey

Thursday, 28 May 2020

• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Ville Voutilainen
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Thiago Macieira
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Thiago Macieira
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Richard Smith
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Richard Smith
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Richard Smith
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Jean-Marc Bourguet
• Re: [SG16] [isocpp-core] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Keane, Erich
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Peter Brett
• [SG16] To which extent characters can be replaced or removed in phase 1? Corentin
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Peter Brett
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Peter Brett
• [SG16] Redefining Lexing in terms of Unicode Corentin
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Zach Laine
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Hubert Tong

Wednesday, 27 May 2020

• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Steve Downey
• [SG16] D1949R4 for post telecon review Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Alisdair Meredith
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-05-27) Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Zach Laine
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-05-27) Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-05-27) Steve Downey

Tuesday, 26 May 2020

• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Alisdair Meredith
• [SG16] D1949R4 - Unicode Identifiers Steve Downey
• [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-05-27) Tom Honermann

Saturday, 23 May 2020

• [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for May 13th, 2020 Tom Honermann
• [SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference Tom Honermann via BlueJeans Network

Wednesday, 13 May 2020

• Re: [SG16] Guidelines for when a WG21 proposal should be reviewed by SG16, the text and Unicode study group JF Bastien
• Re: [SG16] Guidelines for when a WG21 proposal should be reviewed by SG16, the text and Unicode study group Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash
• [SG16] Guidelines for when a WG21 proposal should be reviewed by SG16, the text and Unicode study group Tom Honermann

Tuesday, 12 May 2020

• [SG16] Reminder: SG16 telecon tomorrow (Wednesday, 2020-05-13) Tom Honermann

Thursday, 7 May 2020

• Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix Tom Honermann

Wednesday, 6 May 2020

• Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix JF Bastien
• Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix JF Bastien
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 jm
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Corentin Jabot
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Tom Honermann

Tuesday, 5 May 2020

• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Steve Downey
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Hubert Tong
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Jens Maurer
• [SG16] Multiple combining characters and P1949R3: C++ Identifier Syntax using Unicode Standard Annex 31 Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix Tom Honermann
• Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix JF Bastien
• Re: [SG16] Non-identifier characters in ud-suffix Tom Honermann
• [SG16] SG16 meeting summary for April 22nd, 2020 Tom Honermann

Monday, 4 May 2020

• [SG16] WG21 SG16 (Unicode) teleconference Tom Honermann via BlueJeans Network

Last message date: 2020-06-01 03:15:04