Thank you. Queued for R5.

On Wed, May 27, 2020, 20:36 Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Comments that don't affect the normative content:
>
> No need for comma (and attendant typo) in "unassigned , or unnecessary".
>
> Should SG16 be still listed as part of the audience?
>
>
> This sentence is ambiguous:
> This proposal does not address some potential security concerns, so called
> homoglyph attacks, where letters that appear the same may be treated as
> distinct.
>
> Is the intended scope of the "potential security concerns" coincident with
> "homoglyph attacks"?
>
>
> Replace:
> Defending against such attacks is complex and evolving
> with
> Methods of defense against such attacks is complex and evolving
>
> -- HT
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 6:01 PM Steve Downey via SG16 <
> sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Find attached D1949 with edits as instructed in telecon
>> --
>> SG16 mailing list
>> SG16_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg16
>>
>