C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16] Guidelines for when a WG21 proposal should be reviewed by SG16, the text and Unicode study group

From: JF Bastien <cxx_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 16:34:29 -0700
I quite appreciate this paper, no concerns at all.

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 2:17 PM Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> This is a friendly reminder that SG16 has a paper, P1253
> <https://wg21.link/p1253>, that specifies topics for which SG16 expects
> to be consulted when proposals touch on those topics. Proposal authors
> and, in particular, WG chairs should be familiar with it. SG16 depends on
> WG chairs or their delegates to get SG16 involved as necessary. The goal
> of course is to address any text, encoding, or Unicode concerns early in
> the life of a proposal.
> JF and Bryce, could you please review and, if you have any concerns with
> that paper or with the ability for your respective SGs to direct proposals
> and/or proposal authors our way, follow up with me?
> Tom.

Received on 2020-05-13 18:37:43