Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:32:47 -0700
I don't need to review it; I look at it semi-regularly. A number of SGs
have such rubrics. They are quite useful. I encourage authors to be
familiar with them.
-- the Librarian-in-Chief
have such rubrics. They are quite useful. I encourage authors to be
familiar with them.
-- the Librarian-in-Chief
-- Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash US Programming Language Standards (PL22) Chair ISO C++ Library Evolution Chair CppCon and C++Now Program Chair CUDA Core C++ Libraries (Thrust, CUB, libcu++) Lead @ NVIDIA -- On Wed, May 13, 2020, 14:17 Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote: > This is a friendly reminder that SG16 has a paper, P1253 > <https://wg21.link/p1253>, that specifies topics for which SG16 expects > to be consulted when proposals touch on those topics. Proposal authors > and, in particular, WG chairs should be familiar with it. SG16 depends on > WG chairs or their delegates to get SG16 involved as necessary. The goal > of course is to address any text, encoding, or Unicode concerns early in > the life of a proposal. > > JF and Bryce, could you please review and, if you have any concerns with > that paper or with the ability for your respective SGs to direct proposals > and/or proposal authors our way, follow up with me? > > Tom. >
Received on 2020-05-13 16:36:00