C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16] Guidelines for when a WG21 proposal should be reviewed by SG16, the text and Unicode study group

From: Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash <brycelelbach_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:32:47 -0700
I don't need to review it; I look at it semi-regularly. A number of SGs
have such rubrics. They are quite useful. I encourage authors to be
familiar with them.

-- the Librarian-in-Chief

Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash
US Programming Language Standards (PL22) Chair
ISO C++ Library Evolution Chair
CppCon and C++Now Program Chair
CUDA Core C++ Libraries (Thrust, CUB, libcu++) Lead @ NVIDIA
On Wed, May 13, 2020, 14:17 Tom Honermann <tom_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> This is a friendly reminder that SG16 has a paper, P1253
> <https://wg21.link/p1253>, that specifies topics for which SG16 expects
> to be consulted when proposals touch on those topics.  Proposal authors
> and, in particular, WG chairs should be familiar with it.  SG16 depends on
> WG chairs or their delegates to get SG16 involved as necessary.  The goal
> of course is to address any text, encoding, or Unicode concerns early in
> the life of a proposal.
> JF and Bryce, could you please review and, if you have any concerns with
> that paper or with the ability for your respective SGs to direct proposals
> and/or proposal authors our way, follow up with me?
> Tom.

Received on 2020-05-13 16:36:00