I don't need to review it; I look at it semi-regularly. A number of SGs have such rubrics. They are quite useful. I encourage authors to be familiar with them.

-- the Librarian-in-Chief

--
Bryce Adelstein Lelbach aka wash
US Programming Language Standards (PL22) Chair
ISO C++ Library Evolution Chair
CppCon and C++Now Program Chair
CUDA Core C++ Libraries (Thrust, CUB, libcu++) Lead @ NVIDIA
--

On Wed, May 13, 2020, 14:17 Tom Honermann <tom@honermann.net> wrote:

This is a friendly reminder that SG16 has a paper, P1253, that specifies topics for which SG16 expects to be consulted when proposals touch on those topics.  Proposal authors and, in particular, WG chairs should be familiar with it.  SG16 depends on WG chairs or their delegates to get SG16 involved as necessary.  The goal of course is to address any text, encoding, or Unicode concerns early in the life of a proposal.

JF and Bryce, could you please review and, if you have any concerns with that paper or with the ability for your respective SGs to direct proposals and/or proposal authors our way, follow up with me?

Tom.