On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:46 PM Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <
sg16_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> More non-technical feedback, none of this should affect SG16.
>
> For 6.1, so not assume a wider audience in EWG will immediately
> know that ZWJ is a Zero Width Joiner. A clearer title or Captializing
> The Term may help? Possibly state what a zero width joiner is
> before noting that some scripts rely on them?
>
We might be more concerned about the lack of Zero-width non-joiner:
According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-width_non-joiner),
it is useful even in Latin script.