On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:46 PM Alisdair Meredith via SG16 <sg16@lists.isocpp.org> wrote:
More non-technical feedback, none of this should affect SG16.

For 6.1, so not assume a wider audience in EWG will immediately
know that ZWJ is a Zero Width Joiner.  A clearer title or Captializing
The Term may help?  Possibly state what a zero width joiner is
before noting that some scripts rely on them?
We might be more concerned about the lack of Zero-width non-joiner: According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-width_non-joiner), it is useful even in Latin script.