C++ Logo

SG16

Advanced search

Subject: Re: Emojis in identifiers
From: Peter Brett (pbrett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-06-22 01:56:14


> Whether adding the latter would turn some "yes" votes into
> "no" votes in EWG is unknown. Let's ask.

For clarity, any innovation by WG21 that deviates from the UAX31 guideline will turn my vote from a 'yes' to a 'no' for P1949.

This is not an area in which WG21 should be innovating. People who think that UAX31 is too restrictive and/or not restrictive enough should be getting involved in Unicode in order to enhance UAX31.

                           Peter


SG16 list run by sg16-owner@lists.isocpp.org