Tuesday, 28 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Conditional copy ctor for std::map / std::unordered_map
- Re: [std-proposals] Conditional copy ctor for std::map / std::unordered_map
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Conditional copy ctor for std::map / std::unordered_map
- [std-proposals] Conditional copy ctor for std::map / std::unordered_map
Monday, 27 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
Sunday, 26 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- [std-proposals] Switch on strings
Saturday, 25 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
Friday, 24 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
Thursday, 23 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
Wednesday, 22 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] std::is_lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] std::is_lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] std::is_lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- [std-proposals] std::is_lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
Tuesday, 21 February 2023
Wednesday, 22 February 2023
- [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
Tuesday, 21 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
Monday, 20 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Thoughts on the revival of C++0x Concepts
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: C++ improvements, make it a million times better
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
Sunday, 19 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: C++ improvements, make it a million times better
- [std-proposals] Suggestion: C++ improvements, make it a million times better
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
Saturday, 18 February 2023
Friday, 17 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: Re: Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: Re: Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: Re: Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- [std-proposals] Fwd: Re: Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
Thursday, 16 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
Wednesday, 15 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
Tuesday, 14 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
Monday, 13 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
Sunday, 12 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
Saturday, 11 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
Wednesday, 8 February 2023
Tuesday, 7 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] scoped_lock to support variable number of locks determined during runtime
- Re: [std-proposals] scoped_lock to support variable number of locks determined during runtime
- Re: [std-proposals] scoped_lock to support variable number of locks determined during runtime
- [std-proposals] scoped_lock to support variable number of locks determined during runtime
Sunday, 5 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard attribute [[nocompare]] for defaulted comparisons
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard attribute [[nocompare]] for defaulted comparisons
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard attribute [[nocompare]] for defaulted comparisons
Saturday, 4 February 2023
Friday, 3 February 2023
Thursday, 2 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] New printf/scanf modifiers
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
Wednesday, 1 February 2023
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] New printf/scanf modifiers
- Re: [std-proposals] New printf/scanf modifiers
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
- Re: [std-proposals] New printf/scanf modifiers
- Re: [std-proposals] New printf/scanf modifiers
- Re: [std-proposals] New printf/scanf modifiers
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection