One last revision. I have decided "not to bother", but after the last
meeting PM is now "conservative C++29" target, which was added as a
point in the motivation.
This is I think the realistic-to-optimistic target, mainly because there
are 2 completely different proposals in flight, both of which doing too
much for an initial release (in my opinion obviously).
We have to define *some* scope and get *something *finally.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 7:16 PM Михаил Найденов <mihailnajdenov_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> I made a minor update, mainly adding a bit more to the Proposal section.
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 4:01 PM Михаил Найденов <mihailnajdenov_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Below is a written proposal with a concrete scope, which I consider
>> realistic for C++26.
>> I really don't think any of the current proposals are doble in that time
>> frame.
>>
>> Feedback is welcome if I missed something
>> Thank You
>>
>