Andrew Tomazos
Andrey Semashev
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
Anthony Williams
Antony Polukhin
Arthur O'Dwyer
- Re: [std-proposals] Conditional copy ctor for std::map / std::unordered_map
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] Thoughts on the revival of C++0x Concepts
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
Avi Kivity
Barry Revzin
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
Bharath S
- Re: [std-proposals] scoped_lock to support variable number of locks determined during runtime
- Re: [std-proposals] scoped_lock to support variable number of locks determined during runtime
- [std-proposals] scoped_lock to support variable number of locks determined during runtime
Billy Martin
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
Bjorn Reese
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: Re: Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] New printf/scanf modifiers
Bo Persson
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
Breno Guimarães
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
Chen Zhige
Chris Ryan
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
Christoph Meyer
- Re: [std-proposals] std::is_lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
connor horman
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
David Brown
Edward Catmur
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
Fabio Alemagna
Francesco Pretto
Frederick Virchanza Gotham
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- [std-proposals] std::is_lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
Gergely Nagy
- Re: [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
Guillaume Racicot
hypatia.sva_at
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: Re: Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- [std-proposals] Fwd: Re: Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
Jarrad Waterloo
Jason McKesson
- Re: [std-proposals] Conditional copy ctor for std::map / std::unordered_map
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::is_lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] scoped_lock to support variable number of locks determined during runtime
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Base class reflection
Jens Maurer
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard attribute [[nocompare]] for defaulted comparisons
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] New printf/scanf modifiers
Julien Villemure-Fréchette
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
Lauri Vasama
Lee Shallis
Lénárd Szolnoki
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] std::is_lambda
- Re: [std-proposals] Standard attribute [[nocompare]] for defaulted comparisons
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
Marcin Jaczewski
- Re: [std-proposals] Conditional copy ctor for std::map / std::unordered_map
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
Matthew Groom
Mingxin Wang
Pavel Vazharov
Phil Bouchard
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
Ray Gardener
Robert Allan Schwartz
roberto.romani_at_[hidden]
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
Sebastian Wittmeier
- Re: [std-proposals] Switch on strings
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: Re: Proposal regarding labeld breaking and continuation
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] Safety checks at compile time
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] scoped_lock to support variable number of locks determined during runtime
- Re: [std-proposals] Explicitly specifying default arguments
Thiago Macieira
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] P2815 breaks all provenance-related optimizations
- Re: [std-proposals] unique_lock<atomic_flag>
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] New printf/scanf modifiers
Tom Honermann
Tony V E
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] set_new_handler extension
Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to limit the scope of Pattern Matching for a '26 release
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper on Interfaces (5 Pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow downcasting at compile time if Derived has no extra member objects
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] Make typename optional when used with a name dependent on a constrained template
- Re: [std-proposals] Paper for Preventing Re-entry of Functions (10 pages)
- Re: [std-proposals] int Func(void) noreentry(-1)
- Re: [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] Generalized "default" constructor