Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 08:54:55 -0800
On Friday, 17 February 2023 08:43:15 PST Phil Bouchard wrote:
> Well despite what Jason said earlier, there are 15,500 hits for a search
> engine search such as Google on the subject:
> https://www.google.com/search?q=rtlfreeheap+crash
This search is meaningless. It finds people reporting crashes that ended in
RtlFreeHeap, not that RtlFreeHeap has a problem.
I kept getting assigned the vast majority of pointer bugs in Qt because they
ended with a null pointer consumption inside of the QBasicAtomicPointer class.
But it wasn't a QBasicAtomicPointer bug; the bug had happened way before where
a null pointer was dereferenced.
> Well despite what Jason said earlier, there are 15,500 hits for a search
> engine search such as Google on the subject:
> https://www.google.com/search?q=rtlfreeheap+crash
This search is meaningless. It finds people reporting crashes that ended in
RtlFreeHeap, not that RtlFreeHeap has a problem.
I kept getting assigned the vast majority of pointer bugs in Qt because they
ended with a null pointer consumption inside of the QBasicAtomicPointer class.
But it wasn't a QBasicAtomicPointer bug; the bug had happened way before where
a null pointer was dereferenced.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
Received on 2023-02-17 16:54:56