On 2/20/23 16:25, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 20 February 2023 13:13:42 PST you wrote:
>> A crash because of an unreliable memory allocator is fundamental in my
>> world.
>
> Agreed.
>
> But we have seen no evidence of there being an unreliable memory allocator
> anywhere. Allocators are probably the single most used functionality in the
> entire OS, so an unreliable one is likely going to be detected soon and fixed
> ASAP. They're also scrutinised very closely for the same reason.

I was using a really aggressive application under Windows which I can't
reproduce at home because I only have a deprecated laptop with a Windows
dual-boot. All other machines have Linux.

So I'll need to ask permission to test that on my employer's machine later.


Thanks,

-- 
Logo <https://www.fornux.com/>  
*Phil Bouchard*  facebook icon
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/phil-bouchard-5723a910/> 
CTO
T: (819) 328-4743
E: phil_at_[hidden]| www.fornux.com <http://www.fornux.com>
8 rue de la Baie| Gatineau (Qc), J8T 3H3 Canada
Banner <https://goglobalawards.org/> Le message ci-dessus, ainsi que les
documents l'accompagnant, sont destinés uniquement aux personnes
identifiées et peuvent contenir des informations privilégiées,
confidentielles ou ne pouvant être divulguées. Si vous avez reçu ce
message par erreur, veuillez le détruire.
This communication (and/or the attachments) is intended for named
recipients only and may contain privileged or confidential information
which is not to be disclosed. If you received this communication by
mistake please destroy all copies.