Tuesday, 31 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Benchmarking contract evaluation semantics mode "assume" in Eigen.
- Re: [std-proposals] Extension to runtime polymorphism proposed
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to extended dynamic polymorphism (to fix issues that std::variant fails at addressing)
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 84, Issue 37
- Re: [std-proposals] Benchmarking contract evaluation semantics mode "assume" in Eigen.
Monday, 30 March 2026
- [std-proposals] Extension to runtime polymorphism proposed
- [std-proposals] Extension to runtime polymorphism proposed
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 84, Issue 43
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 84, Issue 42
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 84, Issue 41
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 84, Issue 39
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 84, Issue 37
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 84, Issue 37
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 84, Issue 37
- Re: [std-proposals] Benchmarking contract evaluation semantics mode "assume" in Eigen.
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to extended dynamic polymorphism (to fix issues that std::variant fails at addressing)
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal to extended dynamic polymorphism (to fix issues that std::variant fails at addressing)
- [std-proposals] `random_access_iterator_accessor` for `std::mdspan`?
- Re: [std-proposals] Benchmarking contract evaluation semantics mode "assume" in Eigen.
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandates being allowed to use deleted functions to express the requirements
- [std-proposals] Proposal to extended dynamic polymorphism (to fix issues that std::variant fails at addressing)
Sunday, 29 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandates being allowed to use deleted functions to express the requirements
- Re: [std-proposals] Benchmarking contract evaluation semantics mode "assume" in Eigen.
Saturday, 28 March 2026
Friday, 27 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
Thursday, 26 March 2026
Wednesday, 25 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Named, composable type sets for concept constraints
- [std-proposals] Hacks upon hacks -- Part 1 -- decltype
Tuesday, 24 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandates being allowed to use deleted functions to express the requirements
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandates being allowed to use deleted functions to express the requirements
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandates being allowed to use deleted functions to express the requirements
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandates being allowed to use deleted functions to express the requirements
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandates being allowed to use deleted functions to express the requirements
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandates being allowed to use deleted functions to express the requirements
- Re: [std-proposals] Mandates being allowed to use deleted functions to express the requirements
- [std-proposals] Mandates being allowed to use deleted functions to express the requirements
Sunday, 22 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Default parameters should work with auto
- Re: [std-proposals] Default parameters should work with auto
- Re: [std-proposals] D4102R0: Container insertion and erasure should be allowed to relocate
- Re: [std-proposals] Default parameters should work with auto
- Re: [std-proposals] Default parameters should work with auto
- Re: [std-proposals] D4102R0: Container insertion and erasure should be allowed to relocate
- Re: [std-proposals] D4102R0: Container insertion and erasure should be allowed to relocate
- Re: [std-proposals] D4102R0: Container insertion and erasure should be allowed to relocate
- Re: [std-proposals] Default parameters should work with auto
- Re: [std-proposals] Default parameters should work with auto
- Re: [std-proposals] Default parameters should work with auto
- Re: [std-proposals] Default parameters should work with auto
- [std-proposals] Default parameters should work with auto
Friday, 20 March 2026
Sunday, 15 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Named, composable type sets for concept constraints
- Re: [std-proposals] Named, composable type sets for concept constraints
- Re: [std-proposals] Named, composable type sets for concept constraints
- Re: [std-proposals] Named, composable type sets for concept constraints
Saturday, 14 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Named, composable type sets for concept constraints
- [std-proposals] Named, composable type sets for concept constraints
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
Wednesday, 11 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
Tuesday, 10 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
Monday, 9 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
Sunday, 8 March 2026
Saturday, 7 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
Thursday, 5 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
Tuesday, 3 March 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] P4021 compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
