Saturday, 28 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] 1liner ideas for proposals
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] 1liner ideas for proposals
- [std-proposals] D4039R0 Sequential hexadecimal digits
- Re: [std-proposals] 1liner ideas for proposals
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
Friday, 27 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] D4040R0 Case ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] D4040R0 Case ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] D4040R0 Case ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] D4040R0 Case ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] D4040R0 Case ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] 1liner ideas for proposals
- Re: [std-proposals] 1liner ideas for proposals
- Re: [std-proposals] 1liner ideas for proposals
- Re: [std-proposals] 1liner ideas for proposals
- [std-proposals] 1liner ideas for proposals
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] D4040R0 Case ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] D4040R0 Case ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] D4040R0 Case ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] D4040R0 Case ranges
- [std-proposals] D4040R0 Case ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
Thursday, 26 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- Re: [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
- [std-proposals] D4037R0 Allowing signed char and unsigned char in random number generation
Sunday, 22 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] auto member type deduction from default initializer
- Re: [std-proposals] switch class
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] auto member type deduction from default initializer
- Re: [std-proposals] auto member type deduction from default initializer
- [std-proposals] auto member type deduction from default initializer
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] switch class
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- [std-proposals] compile_assert draft proposal for feedback
Saturday, 21 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
Friday, 20 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- [std-proposals] p3039r1 proxy temporary objects
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
Thursday, 19 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: a way to check if `std::latch` is implemented with atomics
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: a way to check if `std::latch` is implemented with atomics
- [std-proposals] compile_assert() a static assert that fires at compile time, not runtime.
Wednesday, 18 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: a way to check if `std::latch` is implemented with atomics
- Re: [std-proposals] LWG making integers more portable
Tuesday, 17 February 2026
Monday, 16 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: a way to check if `std::latch` is implemented with atomics
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: a way to check if `std::latch` is implemented with atomics
- Re: [std-proposals] LWG making integers more portable
- Re: [std-proposals] LWG making integers more portable
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: a way to check if `std::latch` is implemented with atomics
- [std-proposals] RFC: a way to check if `std::latch` is implemented with atomics
- Re: [std-proposals] LWG making integers more portable
- Re: [std-proposals] LWG making integers more portable
- Re: [std-proposals] LWG making integers more portable
- Re: [std-proposals] LWG making integers more portable
- Re: [std-proposals] LWG making integers more portable
- Re: [std-proposals] LWG making integers more portable
- [std-proposals] LWG making integers more portable
- Re: [std-proposals] alx-0088r0 - noreturn can't return
- Re: [std-proposals] alx-0088r0 - noreturn can't return
Sunday, 15 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] alx-0088r0 - noreturn can't return
- Re: [std-proposals] alx-0088r0 - noreturn can't return
- Re: [std-proposals] alx-0088r0 - noreturn can't return
- Re: [std-proposals] alx-0088r0 - noreturn can't return
- Re: [std-proposals] alx-0088r0 - noreturn can't return
- Re: [std-proposals] alx-0088r0 - noreturn can't return
Saturday, 14 February 2026
- alx-0088r0 - noreturn can't return
- Re: alx-0087r3 - reproducible constraints (was: On ignorability of attributes)
- alx-0087r3 - reproducible constraints (was: On ignorability of attributes)
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Auto-deduction of return value for derived functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Auto-deduction of return value for derived functions.
- [std-proposals] Auto-deduction of return value for derived functions.
Friday, 13 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] On ignorability of attributes
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] On ignorability of attributes
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- On ignorability of attributes
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] switch class
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- [std-proposals] switch class
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
Thursday, 12 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
Wednesday, 11 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] compile-time source introspection and policy-driven code generation in pure ISO C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- [std-proposals] Canonical State Enforcement
- Re: [std-proposals] compile-time source introspection and policy-driven code generation in pure ISO C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] compile-time source introspection and policy-driven code generation in pure ISO C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] compile-time source introspection and policy-driven code generation in pure ISO C++23
- [std-proposals] compile-time source introspection and policy-driven code generation in pure ISO C++23
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
Tuesday, 10 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] On the ignorability of restrict (was: Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]])
- Re: [std-proposals] On the ignorability of restrict (was: Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]])
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: On the ignorability of restrict (was: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]])
- Re: [std-proposals] On the ignorability of restrict (was: Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]])
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- On the ignorability of restrict (was: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]])
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
Monday, 9 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] filesystem::path::iterator should be bidirectional_iterator even if it's not Cpp17BidirectionalIterator
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
Sunday, 8 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
- [std-proposals] Named Return Value Optimisation [[nrvo]]
Saturday, 7 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
Friday, 6 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
Thursday, 5 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] return if
- Re: [std-proposals] return if
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
Wednesday, 4 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] filesystem::path::iterator should be bidirectional_iterator even if it's not Cpp17BidirectionalIterator
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
Tuesday, 3 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] filesystem::path::iterator should be bidirectional_iterator even if it's not Cpp17BidirectionalIterator
- Re: [std-proposals] filesystem::path::iterator should be bidirectional_iterator even if it's not Cpp17BidirectionalIterator
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 83, Issue 8
Monday, 2 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
Sunday, 1 February 2026
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- Re: [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
- [std-proposals] [Idea] Null-terminated string view (c_str_view / c_wstr_view) – a simpler alternative/complement to zstring_view
