On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 at 11:56, Marcin Jaczewski via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> False, I like how they are handled :P
> Only problem is people try sove in things that they should not.
>
> First of all, non-ignorable attributes should be explicit and ilformed
> even if the compiler does not know them even in C++11.
> I suggested adding the prefix `!!` for one like this, this could be
> any symbol that makes C++11 reject this code and make this feature
> backward and forward compatible.
> This will make a clear distinction between these two versions.

Or perhaps use the prefix '='. Like we.. ..already do.