Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:57:20 +0200
On Tue, 10 Feb 2026 at 12:40, Marcin Jaczewski
<marcinjaczewski86_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Or perhaps use the prefix '='. Like we.. ..already do.
>
> I recall that something like this was mentioned, but is it already
> available, what paper add this?
> And if yes then this whole discussion (about attributes) is a bit moot
> as it solves all problems.
That would be https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/p3394r4.html
We don't seem to have (p)reserved any annotation names for use by
standard facilities.
<marcinjaczewski86_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Or perhaps use the prefix '='. Like we.. ..already do.
>
> I recall that something like this was mentioned, but is it already
> available, what paper add this?
> And if yes then this whole discussion (about attributes) is a bit moot
> as it solves all problems.
That would be https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2025/p3394r4.html
We don't seem to have (p)reserved any annotation names for use by
standard facilities.
Received on 2026-02-10 10:57:34
