On Mon, 30 Mar 2026, 16:13 Jason McKesson via Std-Proposals, <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 2:07 AM Muneem via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Recently, I faced some issues in writing code that relied heavily on
> repetitive branching, which forced me to use AI. This proposal proposes
> techniques to counter this, in cases where the overhead of single dispatch
> is highly undesirable.
>
> Let's start off with the form of your proposal.
>
> Using a text file is fine, in so far as being able to read it goes.
> The problem is the formatting; it's bad. None of the code is properly
> indented, which makes reading it a huge pain. Paragraphs are neither
> indented nor double-spaced. Grammar is all over the place; sometimes
> you capitalize `I` correctly; sometimes you don't. Your code contains
> obvious errors, like a lack of `break` statements in switch/case.
>
> Overall, purely from a presentation perspective, it is very difficult
> to read and get any information out of it.
>
> In terms of the content, it's not much better. You mention this type:
>
> vector<vector<type_tag>>, deque<vector<type_tag>>
>


That's not one type, it's a list of two types separated by a comma. This
criticism is unfair.


> That's not how `std::vector` works. The second template argument needs
> to be an allocator, which `std::deque` is not. So is this your own
> `vector` type or is this just nonsense code.
>
> The code you linked to does not seem to be valid C++. It features both
> `if constexpr` and `constexpr if`. Only one of those is legal C++.
>
> Overall, this seems to be slop. Whether AI generated or human
> generated is irrelevant. Maybe there's a coherent idea in there
> *somewhere*, but you need to do some actual work to present it in a
> reasonable fashion.
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>