Adrian Johnston
- Re: [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
- Re: [std-proposals] What a non-reallocating version of the standard would look like.
- [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
- Re: [std-proposals] What a non-reallocating version of the standard would look like.
- Re: [std-proposals] What a non-reallocating version of the standard would look like.
Alejandro Colomar
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor multi-line macroes
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor multi-line macroes
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Direct-list-initialization syntax for default function arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Direct-list-initialization syntax for default function arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Achieving pragma pack(1) with typedef<unaligned>
- Re: [std-proposals] Achieving pragma pack(1) with typedef<unaligned>
- Re: [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
amngis_21d38
- [std-proposals] Huge Hello World
- [std-proposals] Big integers
- [std-proposals] Big integer
- [std-proposals] Entity concept
Andre Kostur
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] Achieving pragma pack(1) with typedef<unaligned>
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
Andrey Semashev
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
Arthur O'Dwyer
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
Aryan Naraghi
Bjorn Reese
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
Bo Persson
- Re: [std-proposals] Huge Hello World
- Re: [std-proposals] Direct-list-initialization syntax for default function arguments
David Brown
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
Dr.ThomasCatalano
Dragan Grbic
Frederick Virchanza Gotham
- [std-proposals] Preprocessor multi-line macroes
- [std-proposals] Don't use templates for differentiating Lvalues from Rvalues
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Achieving pragma pack(1) with typedef<unaligned>
- Re: [std-proposals] Achieving pragma pack(1) with typedef<unaligned>
- [std-proposals] Achieving pragma pack(1) with typedef<unaligned>
- [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
- [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
Giuseppe D'Angelo
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
Halalaluyafail3
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor multi-line macroes
- Re: [std-proposals] D4285R0 Floating-point traits
- Re: [std-proposals] Direct-list-initialization syntax for default function arguments
Hewill Kang
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
Howard Hinnant
Jan Schultke
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] D4285R0 Floating-point traits
- [std-proposals] D4285R0 Floating-point traits
- Re: [std-proposals] Big integers
- Re: [std-proposals] Old Strings Proposal
- Re: [std-proposals] Don't use templates for differentiating Lvalues from Rvalues
- Re: [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
Jason McKesson
Jens Maurer
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor multi-line macroes
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor multi-line macroes
- Re: [std-proposals] D4285R0 Floating-point traits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4285R0 Floating-point traits
- Re: [std-proposals] Big integers
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow using type alias in requires-clause
- Re: [std-proposals] Old Strings Proposal
- Re: [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
Jonathan Grant
- Re: [std-proposals] [[assume_assert(expr)]] and/or evaluation semantics mode "assume".
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
- Re: [std-proposals] What a non-reallocating version of the standard would look like.
- Re: [std-proposals] What a non-reallocating version of the standard would look like.
- Re: [std-proposals] What a non-reallocating version of the standard would look like.
Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] Huge Hello World
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
- Re: [std-proposals] What a non-reallocating version of the standard would look like.
Keenan Horrigan
Lénárd Szolnoki
Michael Galuszka
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations ..(Sebastian Wittmeier, Thiago Macieira, Rainer Deyke)
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect..
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 87, Issue 24
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect..
- [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
Mital Ashok
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
Máté Ték
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
Petr Nechaev
Radu Ungureanu
Rainer Deyke
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
Rhidian De Wit
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- [std-proposals] Old Strings Proposal
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Don't use templates for differentiating Lvalues from Rvalues
Rune Lund Olesen
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
Sebastian Wittmeier
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] D4285R0 Floating-point traits
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Big integers
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Entity concept
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Direct-list-initialization syntax for default function arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Direct-list-initialization syntax for default function arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Achieving pragma pack(1) with typedef<unaligned>
- Re: [std-proposals] Achieving pragma pack(1) with typedef<unaligned>
- Re: [std-proposals] Achieving pragma pack(1) with typedef<unaligned>
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
- Re: [std-proposals] What a non-reallocating version of the standard would look like.
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
Simon Schröder
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Direct-list-initialization syntax for default function arguments
Steve Weinrich
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
Thiago Macieira
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] Preprocessor multi-line macroes
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect..
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Achieving pragma pack(1) with typedef<unaligned>
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] equal_range on unordered associative containers
- Re: [std-proposals] What a non-reallocating version of the standard would look like.
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
- Re: [std-proposals] Function-bound objects with unary operator %
Tiago Freire
- Re: [std-proposals] A better std::byte type
- Re: [std-proposals] D4285R0 Floating-point traits
- Re: [std-proposals] D4285R0 Floating-point traits
- Re: [std-proposals] Exceptions : lost all hope -- do not resuscitate
- Re: [std-proposals] Strategic Direction for AI in C++: Governance, and Ecosystem
- Re: [std-proposals] What a non-reallocating version of the standard would look like.
Ungureanu Radu
- Re: [std-proposals] Direct-list-initialization syntax for default function arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Direct-list-initialization syntax for default function arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] Direct-list-initialization syntax for default function arguments
Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [std-proposals] Entity concept
- Re: [std-proposals] Float the idea: First-class effect annotations and resource contracts for C++
weinrich.steve_at_[hidden]
Yexuan Xiao
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
- [std-proposals] Proposal: Deprecate namespace-scope declarations that are declared both static and inline
