Thursday, 31 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Wednesday, 30 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
Monday, 28 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
Sunday, 27 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Saturday, 26 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Friday, 25 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
Thursday, 24 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[nodiscard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
Wednesday, 23 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] Memory Safety in C++ via Safe Subset and Static Analysis - Master’s Thesis Summary
Tuesday, 22 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- Re: [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- [std-proposals] Similar to [[no_discard]], but store in a variable, maybe call it [[must_store]]
- [std-proposals] D3803R0 More standard forms of main
Monday, 21 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Non-Member Conversion Operator Overload
- Re: [std-proposals] Non-Member Conversion Operator Overload
- Re: [std-proposals] Non-Member Conversion Operator Overload
- Re: [std-proposals] Std-Proposals Digest, Vol 76, Issue 59
- [std-proposals] Non-Member Conversion Operator Overload
Saturday, 19 July 2025
Friday, 18 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- [std-proposals] Fwd: Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
Thursday, 17 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] Dedicated website with AI that has processed all papers
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
Wednesday, 16 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
Tuesday, 15 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
Friday, 11 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
Thursday, 10 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
Wednesday, 9 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
Tuesday, 8 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
Monday, 7 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
Sunday, 6 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] std::construct<T>
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
Saturday, 5 July 2025
Friday, 4 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Detecting bitwise trivially relocatable types
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval .c_str() for string_view
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval .c_str() for string_view
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval .c_str() for string_view
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval .c_str() for string_view
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval .c_str() for string_view
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval .c_str() for string_view
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval .c_str() for string_view
- [std-proposals] consteval .c_str() for string_view
Thursday, 3 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Continue down the ladder (if-else, catch)
- Re: [std-proposals] Continue down the ladder (if-else, catch)
- Re: [std-proposals] Continue down the ladder (if-else, catch)
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- [std-proposals] Continue down the ladder (if-else, catch)
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- [std-proposals] constexpr tolower, toupper, isalpha
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
Wednesday, 2 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Detecting bitwise trivially relocatable types
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] uintfuncptr_t (and mandatory uintptr_t)
- Re: [std-proposals] Detecting bitwise trivially relocatable types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] uintfuncptr_t (and mandatory uintptr_t)
- Re: [std-proposals] uintfuncptr_t (and mandatory uintptr_t)
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- [std-proposals] uintfuncptr_t (and mandatory uintptr_t)
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- [std-proposals] Detecting bitwise trivially relocatable types
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced pessimisation due to unspecified behaviour of negative and zero duration 'sleep_until' in [thread.req.lockable]
- Re: [std-proposals] Forced pessimisation due to unspecified behaviour of negative and zero duration 'sleep_until' in [thread.req.lockable]
- [std-proposals] Forced pessimisation due to unspecified behaviour of negative and zero duration 'sleep_until' in [thread.req.lockable]
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Add an ability to move the top element from std::priority_queue
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Add an ability to move the top element from std::priority_queue
- Re: [std-proposals] Add an ability to move the top element from std::priority_queue
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Add an ability to move the top element from std::priority_queue
Tuesday, 1 July 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Add an ability to move the top element from std::priority_queue
- Re: [std-proposals] Add an ability to move the top element from std::priority_queue
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] Add an ability to move the top element from std::priority_queue
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- [std-proposals] Add an ability to move the top element from std::priority_queue
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- [std-proposals] Shorter fixed-width integer types
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- [std-proposals] promote T[] and deprecate delete[]
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0
- Re: [std-proposals] CHAR_BIT == 8 p3635r0