Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 09:11:26 -0700
On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 8:33 AM Frederick Virchanza Gotham via
Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> First let's talk about uintfuncptr_t.
Why? It doesn't seem to exist: so no idea what you're talking about.
> Let's talk about uintptr_t, and about why it's optional for compilers
> to provide.
Again, why? If it doesn't exist, it fails nicely at compile-time.
> There's a simple universal implementation for these two types:
Third time: why should one care?
Nowhere in there does there seem to be a coherent problem statement.
Please indicate what the actual problem that you're trying to solve is
before going on to try talking about a solution, much less an
implementation to the solution. And then justify why it would warrant
being Standardized.
Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> First let's talk about uintfuncptr_t.
Why? It doesn't seem to exist: so no idea what you're talking about.
> Let's talk about uintptr_t, and about why it's optional for compilers
> to provide.
Again, why? If it doesn't exist, it fails nicely at compile-time.
> There's a simple universal implementation for these two types:
Third time: why should one care?
Nowhere in there does there seem to be a coherent problem statement.
Please indicate what the actual problem that you're trying to solve is
before going on to try talking about a solution, much less an
implementation to the solution. And then justify why it would warrant
being Standardized.
Received on 2025-07-02 16:11:42