Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 20:16:40 +0200
AFAIK
NULL does not have to be represented by actual 0.
But if you assign a 0 to a pointer, it has to be converted to NULL.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:Andrey Semashev via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
Gesendet:Do 31.07.2025 20:23
Betreff:Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
An:std-proposals_at_[hidden];
CC:Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>;
On 31 Jul 2025 21:24, zxuiji via Std-Proposals wrote:
> After seeing all this nonsense I sure am glad I never have to deal with
> it since I stick to C where sanity reigns... at least until your foot
> gets shot XD
If you think C is different wrt. pointer definition, think again.
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
Received on 2025-07-31 18:26:43