Sunday, 31 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Calling C++ functions in a .so directly from foreign languages and C++ as an interface definition language
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Constexpr parameters
- Re: [std-proposals] Calling C++ functions in a .so directly from foreign languages and C++ as an interface definition language
- Re: [std-proposals] Constexpr parameters
- Re: [std-proposals] Container bounds-check
- Re: [std-proposals] Constexpr parameters
- [std-proposals] [Draft] Toward a more expressive grammar for exception qualifiers
- Re: [std-proposals] Constexpr parameters
- Re: [std-proposals] Container bounds-check
- Re: [std-proposals] Calling C++ functions in a .so directly from foreign languages and C++ as an interface definition language
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t (was: TBAA and extended floating-point types)
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Calling C++ functions in a .so directly from foreign languages and C++ as an interface definition language
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t (was: TBAA and extended floating-point types)
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t (was: TBAA and extended floating-point types)
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Container bounds-check
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] Container bounds-check
- [std-proposals] Container bounds-check
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] Calling C++ functions in a .so directly from foreign languages and C++ as an interface definition language
- Re: [std-proposals] Calling C++ functions in a .so directly from foreign languages and C++ as an interface definition language
- Re: [std-proposals] Calling C++ functions in a .so directly from foreign languages and C++ as an interface definition language
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Calling C++ functions in a .so directly from foreign languages and C++ as an interface definition language
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
Saturday, 30 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Calling C++ functions in a .so directly from foreign languages and C++ as an interface definition language
- [std-proposals] Calling C++ functions in a .so directly from foreign languages and C++ as an interface definition language
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Random number generation suggestion
- Re: [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] Random number generation suggestion
- Re: [std-proposals] Random number generation suggestion
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t (was: TBAA and extended floating-point types)
- [std-proposals] Random number generation suggestion
- [std-proposals] char8_t aliasing and Unicode
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] std::expected
- Re: [std-proposals] std::expected
- Re: [std-proposals] std::expected
- [std-proposals] std::expected
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Core language feature idea: structural typing support without templates
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Half baked
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Core language feature idea: structural typing support without templates
- Re: [std-proposals] Core language feature idea: structural typing support without templates
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Core language feature idea: structural typing support without templates
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
Friday, 29 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Constexpr parameters
- Re: [std-proposals] Submitting a proposal - Catch 22?
- Re: [std-proposals] Core language feature idea: structural typing support without templates
- Re: [std-proposals] Submitting a proposal - Catch 22?
- Re: [std-proposals] Submitting a proposal - Catch 22?
- Re: [std-proposals] Submitting a proposal - Catch 22?
- Re: [std-proposals] Submitting a proposal - Catch 22?
- Re: [std-proposals] Submitting a proposal - Catch 22?
- [std-proposals] Submitting a proposal - Catch 22?
- Re: [std-proposals] Constexpr parameters
- Re: [std-proposals] Constexpr parameters
- Re: [std-proposals] Constexpr parameters
- [std-proposals] Constexpr parameters
- Re: [std-proposals] Core language feature idea: structural typing support without templates
- Re: [std-proposals] Core language feature idea: structural typing support without templates
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] Half baked
- Re: [std-proposals] Half baked
- Re: [std-proposals] Half baked
- [std-proposals] Half baked
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
Thursday, 28 August 2025
- [std-proposals] Generalizing radix sort
- [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- [std-proposals] Draft 2: Error on out-of-bounds index
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Timed lock algorithms for multiple lockables R1
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Core language feature idea: structural typing support without templates
- Re: [std-proposals] Core language feature idea: structural typing support without templates
- [std-proposals] Core language feature idea: structural typing support without templates
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Timed lock algorithms for multiple lockables - Was: std::try_lock_for and std::try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
Wednesday, 27 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Timed lock algorithms for multiple lockables - Was: std::try_lock_for and std::try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] Timed lock algorithms for multiple lockables - Was: std::try_lock_for and std::try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Timed lock algorithms for multiple lockables - Was: std::try_lock_for and std::try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] Timed lock algorithms for multiple lockables - Was: std::try_lock_for and std::try_lock_until
- [std-proposals] Timed lock algorithms for multiple lockables - Was: std::try_lock_for and std::try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t (was: TBAA and extended floating-point types)
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t (was: TBAA and extended floating-point types)
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t (was: TBAA and extended floating-point types)
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Function to Find Number of Members in a Pointer
- Re: [std-proposals] Function to Find Number of Members in a Pointer
- Re: [std-proposals] Function to Find Number of Members in a Pointer
- Re: [std-proposals] Function to Find Number of Members in a Pointer
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Function to Find Number of Members in a Pointer
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t (was: TBAA and extended floating-point types)
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t (was: TBAA and extended floating-point types)
- [std-proposals] Function to Find Number of Members in a Pointer
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Possible DR for successive behavior of std::generator
Tuesday, 26 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] charN_t (was: TBAA and extended floating-point types)
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] Possible DR for successive behavior of std::generator
- Re: [std-proposals] Possible DR for successive behavior of std::generator
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- [std-proposals] Possible DR for successive behavior of std::generator
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] An RAII approach to polymorphic allocators
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] Additional assert functionality and the Hatchling Platform
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] An RAII approach to polymorphic allocators
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- [std-proposals] An RAII approach to polymorphic allocators
Monday, 25 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] std::try_lock_for and std::try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] Additional assert functionality and the Hatchling Platform
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] Additional assert functionality and the Hatchling Platform
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
Sunday, 24 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- [std-proposals] Additional assert functionality and the Hatchling Platform
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
Saturday, 23 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
Friday, 22 August 2025
Wednesday, 20 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
Tuesday, 19 August 2025
Monday, 18 August 2025
- [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Memory Safety in C++ via Safe Subset and Static Analysis - Master’s Thesis Summary
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
Sunday, 17 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- Re: [std-proposals] History and Context of Injection
Saturday, 16 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] History and Context of Injection
- [std-proposals] History and Context of Injection
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
Friday, 15 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
Thursday, 14 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax
- Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax
- Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax
- Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax
- Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax
- Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax
- [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax
Sunday, 10 August 2025
Saturday, 9 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor
- [std-proposals] std::constructor
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
Friday, 8 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
Thursday, 7 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
Tuesday, 5 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Monday, 4 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Sunday, 3 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Saturday, 2 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
Friday, 1 August 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value