ISOCPP std-proposals List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Tuesday, 26 August 2025

[std-proposals] An RAII approach to polymorphic allocators Adrian Johnston

Monday, 25 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Adrian Johnston
Re: [std-proposals] std::try_lock_for and std::try_lock_until Ted Lyngmo
Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until Howard Hinnant
Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until Ted Lyngmo
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Brian Bi
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Ivan Matek
Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until Howard Hinnant
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Adrian Johnston
Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until Ted Lyngmo
Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until Ted Lyngmo
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Ivan Matek
Re: [std-proposals] Additional assert functionality and the Hatchling Platform Adrian Johnston
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Adrian Johnston
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until Jan Schultke
Re: [std-proposals] Additional assert functionality and the Hatchling Platform Jan Schultke
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Jan Schultke
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Gašper Ažman
Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Bo Persson
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Bo Persson
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Oliver Hunt
[std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better Adrian Johnston
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Oliver Hunt

Sunday, 24 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Ville Voutilainen
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
[std-proposals] Additional assert functionality and the Hatchling Platform Adrian Johnston
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Julien Villemure-Fréchette
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Lorand Szollosi
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Ville Voutilainen
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Julien Villemure-Fréchette
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Jan Schultke
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Breno Guimarães
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Jan Schultke
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Jens Maurer
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Tom Honermann

Saturday, 23 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion Levo D
Re: [std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion Levo D
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Andre Kostur
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Iúri Chaer
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Bo Persson
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Bo Persson
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Andre Kostur
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! Andre Kostur
[std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?! organicoman

Friday, 22 August 2025

[std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion Levo D

Wednesday, 20 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Thiago Macieira

Tuesday, 19 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Lénárd Szolnoki

Monday, 18 August 2025

[std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until Ted Lyngmo
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer Ted Lyngmo
Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer Ted Lyngmo
Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer Ted Lyngmo
Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer Ted Lyngmo
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] Memory Safety in C++ via Safe Subset and Static Analysis - Master’s Thesis Summary Phil Bouchard
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Jason McKesson
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Yexuan Xiao
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Ben Crowhurst
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Ben Crowhurst
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Andrey Semashev
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls Bo Persson
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Bo Persson
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Andrey Semashev
[std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations. Ben Crowhurst
Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls Jan Schultke
Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls Jan Schultke
Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls Jan Schultke

Sunday, 17 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls Jeremy Rifkin
[std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls Ungureanu Radu Andrei
Re: [std-proposals] History and Context of Injection Omer Rosler

Saturday, 16 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] History and Context of Injection Jens Maurer
[std-proposals] History and Context of Injection Omer Rosler
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Lénárd Szolnoki
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli

Friday, 15 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Lénárd Szolnoki

Thursday, 14 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax Marcin Jaczewski
Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax Ivan Lazaric
Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax Oliver Hunt
[std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax 叶易安

Sunday, 10 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor Avi Kivity

Saturday, 9 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor Ville Voutilainen
Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor Avi Kivity
Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor Ville Voutilainen
Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor Avi Kivity
Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor Jens Maurer
[std-proposals] std::constructor Avi Kivity
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Jan Schultke

Friday, 8 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Hyman Rosen
Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Tiago Freire
[std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types Paul Caprioli
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Arthur O'Dwyer
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg

Thursday, 7 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Howard Hinnant
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Jens Maurer
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg
Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division Sebastian Wittmeier
[std-proposals] Multiprecision division Hans Åberg

Tuesday, 5 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Julien Villemure-Fréchette
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers J Decker

Monday, 4 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Andrey Semashev
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Andrey Semashev
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Oliver Hunt

Sunday, 3 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Andrey Semashev
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Ville Voutilainen
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Andrey Semashev
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Jeremy Rifkin
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Jeremy Rifkin
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Simon Schröder
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Tiago Freire
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Thiago Macieira

Saturday, 2 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Oliver Hunt
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers connor horman
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Ayrton Lachat
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Iúri Chaer
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Iúri Chaer

Friday, 1 August 2025

Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Julien Villemure-Fréchette
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Julien Villemure-Fréchette
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Julien Villemure-Fréchette
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers Julien Villemure-Fréchette
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Andre Kostur
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Iúri Chaer
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Andre Kostur
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Iúri Chaer
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value zxuiji
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value Jan Schultke

Last message date: 2025-08-26 01:17:39