C++ Logo

std-proposals

Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers

From: Jeremy Rifkin <rifkin.jer_at_[hidden]>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2025 16:03:23 -0500
> Good job so, that this is the 'proposals' forum where we can throw out
mad stuff.

If you want to just explore design space in a rubber ducky fashion there
are better venues for that, e.g. isolated conversations with people you
know. This mailing list is for feedback on proposals, not random half-baked
ideas.

> Maybe you remember a few years ago I was talking about tagging 'continue'
onto a function

I’m confused about how this is relevant given the proposal went nowhere.

Cheers,
Jeremy

On Sun, Aug 3, 2025 at 14:29 Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sunday, August 3, 2025, Jeremy Rifkin wrote:
>
>>
>> C++ doesn’t use annotations like this on functions
>>
>
>
> Good job so, that this is the 'proposals' forum where we can throw out mad
> stuff.
>
> Maybe you remember a few years ago I was talking about tagging 'continue'
> onto a function:
>
> http://www.virjacode.com/papers/continuity_methods_draft002.pdf
>
> I love it when people post the newest wildest wackiest stuff here, and I
> wish they did it more.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>

Received on 2025-08-03 21:03:39