[std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
- Re: [std-proposals] The real problems with optimizing C++ are not getting better
[std-proposals] Additional assert functionality and the Hatchling Platform
- Re: [std-proposals] Additional assert functionality and the Hatchling Platform
- Re: [std-proposals] Additional assert functionality and the Hatchling Platform
[std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
- Re: [std-proposals] Delete...why not a parameter by reference?!
[std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion
- Re: [std-proposals] Error on out-of-bounds index, and syntax for conversion
[std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
- Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding try_lock_for and try_lock_until
[std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
- Re: [std-proposals] Forbid optimisations on std::basic_string implementations.
[std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow trailing commas in function calls
[std-proposals] History and Context of Injection
[std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax
- Re: [std-proposals] Some question on C++26 `template for` syntax
[std-proposals] std::constructor
[std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
- Re: [std-proposals] TBAA and extended floating-point types
[std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
- Re: [std-proposals] Multiprecision division
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
- Re: [std-proposals] caller_return - a step in the direction of nicer error-by-value
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Re: [std-proposals] Standardising 0xdeadbeef for pointers
Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Using -1 as the max value for an unsigned integer