Thanks Ville!

I saw that address (and another) in the footer but wasn't sure it was
still reaching him. Just so that there are no mistakes in my request: I
wrote the below to him. Does that look correct?

I'd like to request a number for a proposal I have:

Title: Timed lock algorithms for multiple lockables
Date: 2025-08-30
Audience: Library Evolution Working Group
Reply-to: Ted Lyngmo <ted_at_[hidden]>

Br,
Ted

2025-09-01 20:28, Ville Voutilainen:
> On Mon, 1 Sept 2025 at 18:03, Ted Lyngmo via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Nevin & other that might know!
>>
>> Is the email address on the page valid (..._at_[hidden])? I sent a
>> request for a number to that address.
>
> In the bit you quoted, he's literally using that email address as an
> alternate way to contact him,
> in his email signature, in am email from two days ago. If that's not
> valid, I shall have a little talk with him, I have alternate ways to
> reach
> Mr. Liber that reach beyond mere email. :)
>
>>
>> Br,
>> Ted
>>
>> 2025-08-29 17:40, Nevin Liber:
>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 5:25 PM Jonathan Wakely via Std-Proposals <std-
>>> proposals_at_[hidden] <mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Those instructions are actually out of date as the process for
>>> committee members changed, so the doc is wrong for everybody.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, it's on my list of things to update, but if someone already has
>>> wording... :)
>>> Nevin
>>> --
>>> Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]
>>> <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>> +1-847-691-1404
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals