C++ Logo

std-proposals

Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] std::constructor

From: Avi Kivity <avi_at_[hidden]>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 14:09:42 +0300
On Sat, 2025-08-09 at 23:34 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2025 at 23:23, Avi Kivity <avi_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > > However.. ..should we have a function object version of
> > > make_from_tuple somewhere in this bigger picture?
> >
> >
> > With p3312:
> >
> > std::bind_front(&std::apply, &T::T)
>
> I don't think that paper or its general approach is a solution we can
> expect to have. The problem with it and various predecessors
> is that it doesn't capture overload sets that have ADL-only overloads
> in them. There are some thoughts how to approach
> solving that part of the problem, but they are not baked.


I'm sorry to hear that. I really like that proposal.

If there is interest, I can add std::constructor_from_tuple().

But maybe a function-object applier is better.


std::bind_front(std::applier(), std::constructor<T>());

std::applier()/std::function_application()/whatever is a function
object whose operator()() forwards to std::apply().

Received on 2025-08-10 11:09:48