Hi Oliver,

Thanks for the reply. Just to clarify my previous message — I wasn’t suggesting that the authors are literally named “by author.” I was referring to the way the interface presents the message list, where the column headers (e.g., “Subject,” “Author,” “Date”) might give the impression that the sorting is ambiguous or inconsistent depending on the view.

I understand the UX may be intentionally minimalistic, but I was trying to point out a potential source of confusion for new users. No trolling intended — just trying to improve clarity.

Best regards,
Jerome
________________________________
De : Std-Proposals <std-proposals-bounces_at_lists.isocpp.org> de la part de Jason McKesson via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
Envoyé : lundi 1 septembre 2025 15:18
À : std-proposals_at_[hidden]g <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
Cc : Jason McKesson <jmckesson_at_[hidden]>
Objet : Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion for Improving the std-proposals Archive Interface

On Mon, Sep 1, 2025 at 3:07 AM Oliver Hunt via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I’m really not sure what you’re saying here,
>
> It is providing the messages for each date sorted by subject author or date, it’s unclear what is making it seem as if the authors are named “by author”, etc ?
>
> I recognize that compared to other formats the UX may seem anachronistic, but it does not seem yo reach the bar of being confusing?

Given their previous message, Jerome is clearly trolling. Ignore them.
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.isocpp.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Fstd-proposals&data=05%7C02%7C%7C8de103fb449a402af0c208dde95a0a36%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638923295106935817%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=r4mZczjhmimw1O9O5CbKnqss7QT6Wjwl%2FCBS95P5Kr4%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals>