Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 07:28:00 -0700
On Friday, 18 July 2025 02:22:30 Pacific Daylight Time Oliver Hunt via Std-
Proposals wrote:
> >> That’s not how consent works, and the fact that you are not just
> >> ignoring someone stating explicitly that you do not have permission
> >> to redistribute their work, you are literally dismissing their right to
> >> do so.
> This is disingenuous.
It's not even a good analogy.
If you film at a park and people can't be readily identified, it's fine. If you
film specific people so they can be identified and then publish it, it doesn't
matter that you were at a park or another public setting.
In any case, the easy way around this is to not distribute the content itself,
only link to the original sources.
As to whether a trained AI model is derivative of the sources it was trained
on, I won't comment. That is not settled law yet and I don't even know my own
opinion.
Proposals wrote:
> >> That’s not how consent works, and the fact that you are not just
> >> ignoring someone stating explicitly that you do not have permission
> >> to redistribute their work, you are literally dismissing their right to
> >> do so.
> This is disingenuous.
It's not even a good analogy.
If you film at a park and people can't be readily identified, it's fine. If you
film specific people so they can be identified and then publish it, it doesn't
matter that you were at a park or another public setting.
In any case, the easy way around this is to not distribute the content itself,
only link to the original sources.
As to whether a trained AI model is derivative of the sources it was trained
on, I won't comment. That is not settled law yet and I don't even know my own
opinion.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Principal Engineer - Intel Platform & System Engineering
Received on 2025-07-18 14:28:10