On Tue, 2025-07-15 at 17:04 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 at 16:19, Avi Kivity <avi_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > I don't quite follow what this means. The lambda is not concise? So
> > what?
> >
> > Perhaps show what the solution looks like with std::construct
> > applied?
> >
> >
> >
> > It's shown later in the proposal.
>
> Perhaps move it earlier?
>
> I would find it easier to read the proposal if it would give me the
> narrative
>
> 1) here's a problem
> 2) here's how we solve it with a lambda
> 3) the lambda is verbose, so introduce an acme::construct to make the
> pipeline with transform less verbose
> 4) standardize acme::construct as std::construct
> 5) and we're done


Sure. I updated the web page.

https://github.com/avikivity/cpp-std-proposals/blob/main/std-construct.md