On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 at 16:19, Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com> wrote:

I don't quite follow what this means. The lambda is not concise? So what?

Perhaps show what the solution looks like with std::construct applied?

It's shown later in the proposal.

Perhaps move it earlier?

I would find it easier to read the proposal if it would give me the narrative

1) here's a problem

2) here's how we solve it with a lambda

3) the lambda is verbose, so introduce an acme::construct to make the

pipeline with transform less verbose

4) standardize acme::construct as std::construct

5) and we're done