ISOCPP sg12 List: by thread

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

[ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-31 09:16:15)

Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Ville Voutilainen (2013-10-31 09:31:32)
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Peter Sommerlad (2013-10-31 13:31:19)
- Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Nevin Liber (2013-10-31 17:29:41)
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Nevin Liber (2013-10-31 17:20:47)
- Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-31 17:34:47)
  - Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Tony Van Eerd (2013-10-31 17:41:11)
- Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Daniel Krügler (2013-10-31 18:14:51)
  - Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Tony Van Eerd (2013-10-31 18:19:30)
    - Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Tony Van Eerd (2013-10-31 18:24:03)
      - Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Daniel Krügler (2013-10-31 18:26:13)

[ub] a recent empirical study on undefined behavior-based program transformations Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-31 05:43:12)

Re: [ub] a recent empirical study on undefined behavior-based program transformations Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-31 07:55:49)
- Re: [ub] a recent empirical study on undefined behavior-based program transformations Jean-Marc Bourguet (2013-10-31 08:33:37)

[ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-30 17:14:04)

Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-30 22:06:35)
- Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Jean-Marc Bourguet (2013-10-30 22:56:07)
  - Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-31 00:28:09)
    - Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Jean-Marc Bourguet (2013-10-31 08:25:43)
      - Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-31 23:18:36)
        
        Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Daniel Krügler (2013-11-01 10:55:56)
        
        Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Lawrence Crowl (2013-11-03 23:41:18)
        
        Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Jean-Marc Bourguet (2013-11-04 11:29:36)
- Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-30 23:02:36)
- Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-11-04 03:24:27)
  - Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Lawrence Crowl (2013-11-04 04:10:08)

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Richard Smith (2013-10-25 19:23:56)

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-25 19:37:01)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-26 00:57:04)
- Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Richard Smith (2013-10-26 01:04:29)

[ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr (2013-10-24 17:09:47)

Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Chandler Carruth (2013-10-24 17:44:15)
- Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr (2013-10-24 21:16:10)
  - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Chandler Carruth (2013-10-24 21:46:06)
    - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr (2013-10-24 21:56:33)
      - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Chandler Carruth (2013-10-24 22:06:07)
      - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 22:26:26)
  - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 21:54:36)
    - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr (2013-10-24 22:25:59)
      - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 22:50:19)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr (2013-10-24 22:53:24)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 23:04:08)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr (2013-10-24 23:26:52)
    - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr (2013-10-24 22:51:53)
    - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr (2013-10-25 19:36:45)
      - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-25 19:50:26)
      - Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jens Maurer (2013-10-25 19:50:53)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr (2013-10-25 20:09:41)
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-25 20:10:03)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Richard Smith (2013-10-25 20:31:15)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-25 20:45:17)
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 03:24:54)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jens Maurer (2013-10-28 06:41:35)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-31 00:40:00)
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jens Maurer (2013-10-26 05:53:11)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Howard Hinnant (2013-10-26 18:09:12)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jean-Marc Bourguet (2013-10-26 21:16:31)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Howard Hinnant (2013-10-26 21:36:20)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 04:31:23)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jens Maurer (2013-10-28 06:45:18)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-31 00:46:31)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr (2013-10-31 01:16:04)
        
        Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-31 05:22:29)

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14584] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 09:49:34)

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14584] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 22:34:39)

[ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-07 18:42:43)

Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor W Brown (2013-10-07 19:34:26)
- Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Richard Smith (2013-10-08 00:04:53)
  - Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-08 01:11:50)
    - Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor John Spicer (2013-10-08 01:23:10)
      - Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-08 02:02:57)
        
        Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor John Spicer (2013-10-08 10:54:32)
        
        Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-08 14:41:05)
    - Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Thomas Plum (2013-10-08 02:30:55)
      - Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Richard Smith (2013-10-08 19:26:21)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-14 13:18:01)
- Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Jens Maurer (2013-10-14 21:28:39)
  - Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-14 21:55:21)
  - Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-14 21:58:17)
    - Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-16 23:49:23)
      - Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Jason Merrill (2013-10-17 02:04:01)
        
        Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor James Dennett (2013-10-17 03:54:54)
        
        Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Daniel Krügler (2013-10-17 05:03:10)
        
        Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Nevin Liber (2013-10-17 05:12:42)
        
        Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 14:23:46)

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-10 06:21:20)

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jens Maurer (2013-10-10 06:43:39)
- Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-10 07:36:18)
  - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-10 14:31:09)
    - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-10 20:33:38)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-10 20:39:37)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-10 21:32:41)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-10 21:43:39)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-10 21:58:58)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-10 22:04:21)

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-08-26 16:31:39)

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-10 23:08:38)

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-10 23:24:09)
- Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-11 01:18:18)
  - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-11 01:37:30)
    - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-15 22:39:01)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-15 23:10:09)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 14:54:02)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:06:00)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 15:31:11)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:37:12)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 15:40:45)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:50:59)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 21:57:34)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 14:32:09)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 14:28:12)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-16 21:23:16)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 21:43:43)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-16 21:51:15)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 22:03:37)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-16 22:13:52)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-17 05:27:36)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Peter Sommerlad (2013-10-17 08:38:16)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-17 14:42:21)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 15:17:01)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 15:19:09)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? James Dennett (2013-10-17 19:38:05)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 19:41:18)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-17 19:51:54)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? James Dennett (2013-10-17 20:07:15)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-17 23:12:39)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 23:16:02)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-17 23:28:06)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 00:18:13)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 02:30:20)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 04:06:21)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 04:17:25)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 04:13:15)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 04:30:39)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 05:24:40)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 05:15:27)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 05:53:15)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 23:06:08)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Roger Orr (2013-10-19 11:58:44)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 14:37:22)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 15:14:57)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-17 22:56:25)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 23:10:39)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Stephan T. Lavavej (2013-10-16 22:27:32)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Herb Sutter (2013-10-18 15:10:22)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 15:43:16)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Herb Sutter (2013-10-18 16:03:42)
        
        [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 16:14:21)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Ville Voutilainen (2013-10-18 16:26:25)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 16:41:00)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Ville Voutilainen (2013-10-18 16:52:08)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Stephan T. Lavavej (2013-10-18 19:05:41)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Matt Austern (2013-10-18 19:54:38)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 20:22:30)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits John Spicer (2013-10-18 20:32:21)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-19 03:19:31)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-19 06:37:03)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-19 07:03:47)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Herb Sutter (2013-10-19 21:37:31)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-20 11:18:10)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Herb Sutter (2013-10-21 16:22:38)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14564] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jean-Marc Bourguet (2013-10-19 08:02:14)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 20:37:09)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-19 03:15:57)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jason Merrill (2013-10-20 03:51:06)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Richard Smith (2013-10-24 22:40:47)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 22:50:30)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits John Regehr (2013-10-24 23:01:55)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 23:15:05)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Aaron Ballman (2013-10-24 23:22:32)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14587] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits keld_at (2013-10-24 23:23:09)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Richard Smith (2013-10-24 23:38:54)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14593] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits keld_at (2013-10-25 00:07:21)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-26 20:31:44)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits John Regehr (2013-10-26 20:51:11)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-26 21:50:13)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-27 13:37:30)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 00:07:13)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-28 21:19:59)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jean-Marc Bourguet (2013-10-27 08:06:51)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits John Regehr (2013-10-27 16:08:26)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-27 17:08:48)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-27 17:12:53)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-27 17:17:20)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-27 22:46:35)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-27 23:52:01)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 01:32:24)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jeffrey Yasskin (2013-10-28 17:07:24)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-30 21:25:05)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2018-11-24 11:59:16)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-28 21:43:39)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-30 21:48:57)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-27 13:28:23)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Xavier Leroy (2013-10-20 10:05:23)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-20 17:36:39)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Xavier Leroy (2013-10-21 11:49:32)
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 04:35:31)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Xavier Leroy (2013-10-24 08:06:53)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 23:01:30)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 20:41:46)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 06:33:57)
        
        Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14579] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 07:14:30)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 07:25:06)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 09:02:38)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-24 22:46:13)
        
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-24 23:10:29)
        Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-25 18:44:41)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Martin Sebor (2013-10-18 16:47:23)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 05:15:44)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-18 16:29:22)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ion Gaztañaga (2013-10-18 17:00:10)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 05:20:19)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl (2013-10-28 05:11:14)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-15 23:14:29)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 15:15:19)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:27:45)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 15:38:39)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:46:33)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ville Voutilainen (2013-10-16 15:50:57)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-16 15:53:34)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 15:55:32)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ville Voutilainen (2013-10-16 15:58:41)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-16 21:15:43)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 21:25:19)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-16 21:43:19)
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-17 15:22:54)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber (2013-10-16 16:04:26)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 04:29:00)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Howard Hinnant (2013-10-18 17:28:53)
        
        Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 18:19:15)
      - Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jason Merrill (2013-10-16 21:49:03)
  - [ub] set keys and ordering Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-11 01:44:05)
  - [ub] Canonical ordering Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-11 01:57:33)
    - Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Christopher Jefferson (2013-10-18 06:46:42)
      - Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 07:07:44)
      - Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Nevin Liber (2013-10-18 17:12:58)
        
        Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Gabriel Dos Reis (2013-10-18 17:21:37)
        Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Herb Sutter (2013-10-18 17:22:56)

Last message date: 2013-10-31 18:26:13