Subject: Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-18 11:41:00
On 18 October 2013 11:26, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> Would anyone like to summarize the EWG issue people desire to raise? Just
> making the optional int types non-optional? Something further than that as
> Nailing down CHAR_BIT? Anything else?
Well, if we are going to start nailing things down, I'm all for totally
ordering pointers with respect to operator<.
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> (847) 691-1404
SG12 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com