On 18 October 2013 11:26, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com> wrote:

Would anyone like to summarize the EWG issue people desire to raise? Just
making the optional int types non-optional? Something further than that as well?
Nailing down CHAR_BIT? Anything else?

Well, if we are going to start nailing things down, I'm all for totally ordering pointers with respect to operator<. 
--
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com>  (847) 691-1404