ISOCPP sg12 List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Thursday, 31 October 2013

Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Daniel Krügler
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Tony Van Eerd
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Tony Van Eerd
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Daniel Krügler
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Tony Van Eerd
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Christopher Jefferson
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Peter Sommerlad
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Ville Voutilainen
[ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables Christopher Jefferson
Re: [ub] a recent empirical study on undefined behavior-based program transformations Jean-Marc Bourguet
Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Jean-Marc Bourguet
Re: [ub] a recent empirical study on undefined behavior-based program transformations Lawrence Crowl
[ub] a recent empirical study on undefined behavior-based program transformations Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Lawrence Crowl

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Jeffrey Yasskin
Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Jean-Marc Bourguet
Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl
[ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. Jeffrey Yasskin

Monday, 28 October 2013

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jeffrey Yasskin
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jens Maurer
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jens Maurer
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl

Sunday, 27 October 2013

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jeffrey Yasskin
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jeffrey Yasskin
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits John Regehr
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jean-Marc Bourguet

Saturday, 26 October 2013

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Howard Hinnant
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jean-Marc Bourguet
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits John Regehr
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Howard Hinnant
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jens Maurer
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Richard Smith
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl

Friday, 25 October 2013

Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Richard Smith
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jeffrey Yasskin
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Jens Maurer
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Richard Smith
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14593] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits keld_at

Thursday, 24 October 2013

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits Richard Smith
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14587] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits keld_at
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Aaron Ballman
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits John Regehr
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Richard Smith
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14584] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Chandler Carruth
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Chandler Carruth
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift Chandler Carruth
[ub] ub due to left operand of shift John Regehr
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14584] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Xavier Leroy
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14579] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl

Monday, 21 October 2013

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Herb Sutter
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Xavier Leroy

Sunday, 20 October 2013

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Xavier Leroy
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jason Merrill

Saturday, 19 October 2013

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Herb Sutter
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Roger Orr
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14564] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Jean-Marc Bourguet
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Ion Gaztañaga
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits Lawrence Crowl

Friday, 18 October 2013

Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits John Spicer
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Matt Austern
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits Stephan T. Lavavej
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Howard Hinnant
Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Herb Sutter
Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ion Gaztañaga
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Ville Voutilainen
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Martin Sebor
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ion Gaztañaga
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits Ville Voutilainen
[ub] Sized integer types and char bits Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Herb Sutter
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Herb Sutter
Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Canonical ordering Christopher Jefferson
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis

Thursday, 17 October 2013

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? James Dennett
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? James Dennett
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Peter Sommerlad
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Daniel Krügler
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor James Dennett
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Jason Merrill

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Stephan T. Lavavej
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jeffrey Yasskin
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jason Merrill
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber

Monday, 14 October 2013

Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Jens Maurer
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis

Friday, 11 October 2013

[ub] Canonical ordering Gabriel Dos Reis
[ub] set keys and ordering Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber

Thursday, 10 October 2013

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Christopher Jefferson
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Nevin Liber
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Jens Maurer
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? Lawrence Crowl

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Richard Smith
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor John Spicer
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Thomas Plum
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor John Spicer
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Richard Smith

Monday, 7 October 2013

Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor W Brown
[ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor Gabriel Dos Reis

Last message date: 2013-10-31 18:26:13