Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:54:54 -0700
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Jason Merrill <jason_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 07:49 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> For the preprocessor, I would rather not see undiagnosed differences in
>> behavior. Wouldn't it be best to simply poll the vendors and see if
>> they are okay with standardizing on "UCN from splicing"?
>
> Agreed. UCNs are new, we don't need to accommodate variance in existing
> practice here.
UCNs or UDLs?
-- James
> On 10/16/2013 07:49 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>> For the preprocessor, I would rather not see undiagnosed differences in
>> behavior. Wouldn't it be best to simply poll the vendors and see if
>> they are okay with standardizing on "UCN from splicing"?
>
> Agreed. UCNs are new, we don't need to accommodate variance in existing
> practice here.
UCNs or UDLs?
-- James
Received on 2013-10-17 05:54:56