C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor

From: Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler_at_[hidden]>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 07:03:10 +0200
2013/10/17 James Dennett <jdennett_at_[hidden]>:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Jason Merrill <jason_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 10/16/2013 07:49 PM, Lawrence Crowl wrote:
>>> For the preprocessor, I would rather not see undiagnosed differences in
>>> behavior. Wouldn't it be best to simply poll the vendors and see if
>>> they are okay with standardizing on "UCN from splicing"?
>> Agreed. UCNs are new, we don't need to accommodate variance in existing
>> practice here.
> UCNs or UDLs?

I don't know why, but if I see "UDL" I always read this as
"user-defined language" ;-)

- Daniel

Received on 2013-10-17 07:03:11