ISOCPP sg12 List: by author

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Aaron Ballman

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 23:22:32)

Chandler Carruth

Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 22:06:07)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 21:46:06)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 17:44:15)

Christopher Jefferson

Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 17:34:47)
[ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 09:16:15)
Re: [ub] Canonical ordering (2013-10-18 06:46:42)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 21:51:15)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 21:43:19)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 21:23:16)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 21:15:43)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 21:58:58)

Daniel Krügler

Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 18:26:13)
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 18:14:51)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-17 05:03:10)

Gabriel Dos Reis

[ub] a recent empirical study on undefined behavior-based program transformations (2013-10-31 05:43:12)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-27 17:17:20)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-27 17:08:48)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-27 13:37:30)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-27 13:28:23)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-25 20:45:17)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-25 19:50:26)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-25 19:37:01)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-25 18:44:41)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 23:04:08)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 22:50:30)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 22:46:13)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 22:26:26)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14584] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 09:49:34)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 09:02:38)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 07:25:06)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 06:33:57)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-20 17:36:39)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-19 07:03:47)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-18 20:41:46)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-18 20:37:09)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-18 20:22:30)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 18:19:15)
Re: [ub] Canonical ordering (2013-10-18 17:21:37)
[ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-18 16:14:21)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 15:43:16)
Re: [ub] Canonical ordering (2013-10-18 07:07:44)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 05:53:15)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 05:24:40)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 04:29:00)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 04:17:25)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 04:13:15)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 00:18:13)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 23:06:08)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 23:16:02)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 23:10:39)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 19:41:18)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 15:22:54)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 15:19:09)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 15:17:01)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 15:14:57)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 14:37:22)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 14:32:09)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 14:28:12)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-17 14:23:46)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:53:34)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:50:59)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:46:33)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:37:12)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:27:45)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:06:00)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-15 23:14:29)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-15 23:10:09)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-14 21:58:17)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-14 21:55:21)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-14 13:18:01)
[ub] Canonical ordering (2013-10-11 01:57:33)
[ub] set keys and ordering (2013-10-11 01:44:05)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-11 01:37:30)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 23:24:09)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 22:04:21)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 21:43:39)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 20:39:37)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-08 14:41:05)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-08 02:02:57)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-08 01:11:50)
[ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-07 18:42:43)

Herb Sutter

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-21 16:22:38)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-19 21:37:31)
Re: [ub] Canonical ordering (2013-10-18 17:22:56)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 16:03:42)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 15:10:22)

Howard Hinnant

Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-26 21:36:20)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-26 18:09:12)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 17:28:53)

Ion Gaztañaga

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-28 21:43:39)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-28 21:19:59)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-27 22:46:35)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-26 21:50:13)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-26 20:31:44)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-20 11:18:10)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-19 06:37:03)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 17:00:10)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 16:29:22)

James Dennett

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 20:07:15)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 19:38:05)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-17 03:54:54)

Jason Merrill

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-20 03:51:06)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-17 02:04:01)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 21:49:03)

Jean-Marc Bourguet

Re: [ub] a recent empirical study on undefined behavior-based program transformations (2013-10-31 08:33:37)
Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. (2013-10-31 08:25:43)
Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. (2013-10-30 22:56:07)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-27 08:06:51)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-26 21:16:31)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14564] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-19 08:02:14)

Jeffrey Yasskin

Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. (2013-10-30 23:02:36)
[ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. (2013-10-30 17:14:04)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-28 17:07:24)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-27 23:52:01)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-27 17:12:53)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-25 20:10:03)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 19:51:54)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 22:13:52)

Jens Maurer

Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-28 06:45:18)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-28 06:41:35)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-26 05:53:11)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-25 19:50:53)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-14 21:28:39)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 06:43:39)

John Regehr

Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-31 01:16:04)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-27 16:08:26)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-26 20:51:11)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-25 20:09:41)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-25 19:36:45)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 23:26:52)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 23:01:55)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 22:53:24)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 22:51:53)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 22:25:59)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 21:56:33)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 21:16:10)
[ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 17:09:47)

John Spicer

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-18 20:32:21)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-08 10:54:32)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-08 01:23:10)

keld_at

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14593] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-25 00:07:21)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14587] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 23:23:09)

Lawrence Crowl

Re: [ub] a recent empirical study on undefined behavior-based program transformations (2013-10-31 07:55:49)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-31 05:22:29)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-31 00:46:31)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-31 00:40:00)
Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. (2013-10-31 00:28:09)
Re: [ub] Aliasing char16_t with int_least16_t, etc. (2013-10-30 22:06:35)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-30 21:48:57)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-30 21:25:05)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-28 05:20:19)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-28 05:11:14)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-28 05:15:44)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-28 04:31:23)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-28 03:24:54)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-28 01:32:24)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-28 00:07:13)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-26 00:57:04)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 23:15:05)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 23:10:29)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 23:01:30)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 22:50:19)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14584] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 22:34:39)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-24 21:54:36)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14579] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 07:14:30)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 04:35:31)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-19 03:19:31)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-19 03:15:57)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 23:28:06)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 23:12:39)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 22:56:25)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-16 23:49:23)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 21:32:41)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 20:33:38)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 07:36:18)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 06:21:20)

Martin Sebor

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 16:47:23)

Matt Austern

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-18 19:54:38)

Nevin Liber

Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 17:29:41)
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 17:20:47)
Re: [ub] Canonical ordering (2013-10-18 17:12:58)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-18 16:41:00)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 05:15:27)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 04:30:39)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 04:06:21)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-18 02:30:20)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 14:42:21)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 05:27:36)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-17 05:12:42)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 22:03:37)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 21:57:34)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 21:43:43)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 21:25:19)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 16:04:26)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:55:32)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:40:45)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:38:39)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:31:11)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:15:19)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 14:54:02)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-15 22:39:01)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-11 01:18:18)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 23:08:38)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-10 14:31:09)

Peter Sommerlad

Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 13:31:19)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-17 08:38:16)

Richard Smith

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-26 01:04:29)
Re: [ub] ub due to left operand of shift (2013-10-25 20:31:15)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14598] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-25 19:23:56)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14592] Re: Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 23:38:54)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14557] Re: Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 22:40:47)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-08 19:26:21)
Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-08 00:04:53)

Roger Orr

Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-19 11:58:44)

Stephan T. Lavavej

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-18 19:05:41)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 22:27:32)

Thomas Plum

Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-08 02:30:55)

Tony Van Eerd

Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 18:24:03)
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 18:19:30)
Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 17:41:11)

Ville Voutilainen

Re: [ub] Undefined behaviour from uninitialised variables (2013-10-31 09:31:32)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-18 16:52:08)
Re: [ub] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-18 16:26:25)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:58:41)
Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers? (2013-10-16 15:50:57)

W Brown

Re: [ub] Remove undefined behavior from the preprocessor (2013-10-07 19:34:26)

Xavier Leroy

Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-24 08:06:53)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-21 11:49:32)
Re: [ub] [c++std-ext-14555] Sized integer types and char bits (2013-10-20 10:05:23)

Last message date: 2013-10-31 18:26:13