Subject: Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers?
From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-17 18:10:39
Lawrence Crowl <Lawrence_at_[hidden]> writes:
| Maybe the problem we should be
| considering is how we adapt C++ to unordered address spaces.
SG12 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com