Subject: Re: [ub] Justification for < not being a total order on pointers?
From: Ville Voutilainen (ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-16 10:58:41
On 16 October 2013 18:53, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Only on the cases, e.g. input values, where they aren't both defined.
> That isn't failure. You're looking at the value of the proposition when
> preconditions aren't satisfied, we all know what happens :-)
Indeed we do know, Lakos will throw an exception.
I'll get my coat now. :)
SG12 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com