Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:49:03 -0400
On 10/15/2013 06:39 PM, Nevin Liber wrote:
> The current rule of "calling operator< on pointers can invoke ub at the
> drop of a hat", while historically necessary, is a horrible, horrible rule.
Where is this rule? What I see in the current WP is
"Otherwise, the result of each of the operators is unspecified."
And unspecified is significantly different from undefined.
Jason
> The current rule of "calling operator< on pointers can invoke ub at the
> drop of a hat", while historically necessary, is a horrible, horrible rule.
Where is this rule? What I see in the current WP is
"Otherwise, the result of each of the operators is unspecified."
And unspecified is significantly different from undefined.
Jason
Received on 2013-10-17 00:00:33